Overall rank by patents
#32,260
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kongsberg ranks #32,260 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 6 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32260 · US Corporation #32,260 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kindred Biosciences, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Samsung Electro-mech… · near
28 score
humangear · near
28 score
Kongsberg Driveline… · this assignee
28 score
Blunt Wrap U · near
28 score
GranBlueTech L L C · near
28 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kongsberg's Innovation Score is 28.3/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Kongsberg Driveline Systems I, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Kongsberg sits between Kindred Biosciences, Inc. and Koninklijke Asscher Diamant Maatschappij B.V..
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Kindred Biosciences, Inc.
8 patents
King Penn Industries, Inc.
8 patents
KinnexA, Inc.
8 patents
Knoxville Locomotive Works, Inc.
8 patents
Kongsberg Power Products Systems AB
8 patents
Kongsberg Seatex AS
8 patents
Koning Corporation
8 patents
Koninklijke Asscher Diamant Maatschappij B.V.
8 patents
Kongsberg Driveline Systems I, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Kongsberg holds 8 patents at rank #32,268, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,268 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kongsberg's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Kongsberg, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (28 here).
Kongsberg's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2021 | 1 | 12.5% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#32,260
of 49,997 tracked assignees
28.3 out of 100
What to do with this data
Kongsberg Driveline Systems I, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.