Overall rank by patents
#48,100
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2020–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B32B (LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM).
The verdict
Kimpai holds 5 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #48,100 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd. has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2020 and 2023, placing Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd. at rank #48,100 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in B32B (LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM). As a Foreign Corporation, Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Kimpai sits between Kieran Murphy Llc (5 patents, rank #48,096) and Kingtiger Technology (canada) Inc. (5 patents, rank #48,104) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 27.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2023, with 5 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd.'s 12.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
KIERAN MURPHY LLC
5 patents
KIKO S.P.A.
5 patents
KIKU SRL GmbH
5 patents
KILT PLANNING OFFICE INC.
5 patents
KIMTRON, INC.
5 patents
KIND PET PRODUCTS CO., LTD
5 patents
KING AGRO EUROPA S.L.
5 patents
KINGTIGER TECHNOLOGY (CANADA) INC.
5 patents
KIMPAI LAMITUBE CO., LTD.
5 patents
What this shows Kimpai holds 5 patents at rank #48,100, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,100 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kimpai's primary technology class.
Kimpai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 Top 77% higher than 23% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 40.0% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#48,100
Across all tracked assignees
27.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Kimpai's 5 grants land it in the top 77% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.