Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Kimpai ranks #48,135 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #48,135
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 23rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.2/100)
- 12.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R48135 · Foreign Corporation #48,135 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #48,135/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Kieran Murphy
- CPC-NARROW B32B · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2020–2023 · 4y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Kieran Murphy LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Kimpai’s 27.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Kimpai
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Kimpai Lamitube · this assignee 27
Kimpai Lamitube · this assignee
27 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Kimpai's Innovation Score is 27.2/100 (23rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Kimpai?
Each dot is one of Kimpai’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Kimpai’s own 12.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Kimpai's grants concentrate
Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Kimpai sits between Kieran Murphy LLC and Kingtiger Technology (CANADA) Inc..
Kimpai's three-year grant acceleration
Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Kimpai's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Kieran Murphy
Kieran Murphy LLC
5 patents
- Kiko S P A
Kiko S.P.A.
5 patents
- Kiku SRL
Kiku SRL GmbH
5 patents
- Kilt Planning Off…
Kilt Planning Office Inc.
5 patents
- Kimtron
Kimtron, Inc.
5 patents
- Kind PET Products
Kind PET Products Co., Ltd
5 patents
- King Agro Europa…
King Agro Europa S.L.
5 patents
- Kingtiger Technol…
Kingtiger Technology (CANADA) Inc.
5 patents
- Kimpai Lamitube ◀
Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows Kimpai holds 5 patents at rank #48,100, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Kimpai
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,100 in granted patent volume.
- Kieran Murphy LLC #48,096 · 5 patents
- Kiko S.P.A. #48,097 · 5 patents
- Kiku SRL GmbH #48,098 · 5 patents
- Kilt Planning Office Inc. #48,099 · 5 patents
- Kimtron, Inc. #48,101 · 5 patents
- Kind PET Products Co., Ltd #48,102 · 5 patents
- King Agro Europa S.L. #48,103 · 5 patents
- Kingtiger Technology (CANADA) Inc. #48,104 · 5 patents
Leaders in B32B (Layered Products)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kimpai's primary technology class.
Kimpai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
27 23rd percentile higher than 23% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is B32B (Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B32B
- Ranked #48,135 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Kimpai Lamitube Co., Ltd. against Kieran Murphy LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.