Keller Holding GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Keller ranks #36,108 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #36,108
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 49%
- by Innovation Score (35.4/100)
- 17.3
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R36108 · Foreign Corporation #36,108 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #36,108/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Katana Racing
- CPC-FOCUS E02D · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Katana Racing, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Keller’s 35.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Keller
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Keller Holding · this assignee
Keller Holding · this assignee
35 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Keller's Innovation Score is 35.4/100 (top 49% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Keller?
Each dot is one of Keller’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Keller’s own 17.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Keller's grants concentrate
Keller Holding GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Keller sits between Katana Racing, Inc. and Keystone Ridge Designs, Inc..
Keller's three-year grant acceleration
Keller Holding GmbH shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Keller's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Katana Racing
Katana Racing, Inc.
7 patents
- Kawasaki Kasei Ch…
Kawasaki Kasei Chemicals Ltd.
7 patents
- Kehuangda (Guangz…
Kehuangda (Guangzhou) Trading Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Kelisec AB
Kelisec AB
7 patents
- Kelsyus
Kelsyus, LLC
7 patents
- Kemeera
Kemeera, Inc.
7 patents
- Kentuckiana Curb
Kentuckiana Curb Company, Inc.
7 patents
- Keystone Ridge De…
Keystone Ridge Designs, Inc.
7 patents
- Keller Holding ◀
Keller Holding GmbH
7 patents
What this shows Keller holds 7 patents at rank #36,130, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Keller
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,130 in granted patent volume.
- Katana Racing, Inc. #36,126 · 7 patents
- Kawasaki Kasei Chemicals Ltd. #36,127 · 7 patents
- Kehuangda (Guangzhou) Trading Co., Ltd. #36,128 · 7 patents
- Kelisec AB #36,129 · 7 patents
- Kelsyus, LLC #36,131 · 7 patents
- Kemeera, Inc. #36,132 · 7 patents
- Kentuckiana Curb Company, Inc. #36,133 · 7 patents
- Keystone Ridge Designs, Inc. #36,134 · 7 patents
Leaders in E02D (Foundations)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Keller's primary technology class.
Keller's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 Top 49% higher than 51% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Keller Holding GmbH patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Keller Holding GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Keller Holding GmbH's lead technology class is E02D (FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; Embankments ; Underground OR Underwater Structures), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02D
- Ranked #36,108 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Keller Holding GmbH against Katana Racing, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.