Overall rank by patents
#48,183
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2023–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H05B (ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL).
The verdict
Kanthal holds 5 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #48,183 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Kanthal Gmbh has been granted 5 US utility patents between 2023 and 2025, placing Kanthal Gmbh at rank #48,183 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in H05B (ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL). As a Foreign Corporation, Kanthal Gmbh is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Kanthal sits between Kambix Innovations, Llc (5 patents, rank #48,179) and Kedlin Company Llc (5 patents, rank #48,187) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 47.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2023 through 2025, with 5 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Kanthal Gmbh's 19.2 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Kanthal Gmbh against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Kambix Innovations, LLC
5 patents
KanDao Technology Co., Ltd.
5 patents
Kaneka Americas Holding, Inc.
5 patents
Kaney Aerospace, Inc.
5 patents
Kasisto, Inc.
5 patents
Kaufman & Robinson, Inc.
5 patents
Kazark, Inc.
5 patents
Kedlin Company LLC
5 patents
Kanthal GmbH
5 patents
What this shows Kanthal holds 5 patents at rank #48,183, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #48,183 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Kanthal's primary technology class.
Kanthal's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
47 Top 19% higher than 81% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2025 | 2 | 40.0% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#48,183
Across all tracked assignees
47.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Kanthal's 5 grants land it in the top 19% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.