Overall rank by patents
#36,008
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 8 technology areas, active 2016–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B65G (TRANSPORT OR STORAGE DEVICES, e.g. CONVEYORS FOR LOADING OR TIPPING, SHOP CONVEYOR SYSTEMS OR PNEUMATIC TUBE CONVEYORS).
The verdict
JM holds 7 US patents across 8 technology areas, rank #36,008 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
JM Industries Group has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2016 and 2024, placing JM Industries Group at rank #36,008 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 8 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in B65G (TRANSPORT OR STORAGE DEVICES, e.g. CONVEYORS FOR LOADING OR TIPPING, SHOP CONVEYOR SYSTEMS OR PNEUMATIC TUBE CONVEYORS). As a Foreign Corporation, JM Industries Group is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, JM sits between Jingdong Digits Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (7 patents, rank #36,004) and JOB Lizenz Gmbh & Co. KG (7 patents, rank #36,012) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 1 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -83% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. JM Industries Group's 11.1 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 8 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark JM Industries Group against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
JINGDONG DIGITS TECHNOLOGY HOLDING CO., LTD.
7 patents
JIO, Inc.
7 patents
JIYONSON CO., LTD
7 patents
JJ Acquisition, LLC
7 patents
JMC CORPORATION
7 patents
JNK TECH
7 patents
JNT Technical Services, Inc.
7 patents
JOB LIZENZ GMBH & CO. KG
7 patents
JM Industries Group
7 patents
What this shows JM holds 7 patents at rank #36,008, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #36,008 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in JM's primary technology class.
JM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 65% higher than 35% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#36,008
Across all tracked assignees
30.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
JM's 7 grants land it in the top 65% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.