USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Jay at Play International Hong Kong Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Jay ranks #22,824 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 4 technology areas.

#22,824
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
15th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.4/100)
14.2
avg claims per patent
-67%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R22824 · Foreign Corporation #22,824 · 12 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
  • MID-PACK #22,824/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Jenam Tech
  • CPC-NARROW A63H · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.4/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 14.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -67% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Jenam Tech, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Jay’s 24.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Jay

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Jay's Innovation Score is 24.4/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Jay?

Each dot is one of Jay’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Jay’s own 14.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Jay vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 11.911.91212.1 020406080100 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent JP Laboratories, Inc. - 12, 17.83JP LaboratoriesJP Steel Plantech Co. - 12, 9.42JP Steel PlantechJPT Group LLC - 12, 1JPT GroupJTech Solutions, Inc. - 12, 11.5Jtech SolutionsJenam Tech, LLC - 12, 77.42Jenam TechJenoptik Robot GmbH - 12, 11.42Jenoptik RobotJetCool Technologies Inc. - 12, 19.75JetcoolJiangxi EQI Industrial Co. Ltd - 12, 7.33Jiangxi EQI Indus…Jay at Play International Hong Kong Limited - 12, 14.17Jay at Play Inter…
Jay vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Jay's grants concentrate

Jay at Play International Hong Kong Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Jay sits between JP Laboratories, Inc. and Jiangxi EQI Industrial Co. Ltd.

Who files at Jay's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Jay holds 12 patents at rank #22,832, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Jay

By rank, the assignees closest to #22,832 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63H (Toys)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Jay's primary technology class.

Jay's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 20152018201920202021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Jay at Play International Hong Kong Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 8.3%
2018 4 33.3%
2019 4 33.3%
2020 2 16.7%
2021 1 8.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Jay at Play International Hong Kong Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Jay at Play International Hong Kong Limited's lead technology class is A63H (Toys, e.g. Tops, Dolls, Hoops OR Building Blocks), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63H
  • Ranked #22,824 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Jay at Play International Hong Kong Limited against JP Laboratories, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.