Where does Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. ranks #47,911 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

Is Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc.'s patents?

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc.'s patents average 7.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc.

Q: How many patents does Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. hold?

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2024, spanning 4 technology areas.

Q: What is Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 20.9 out of 100 (8th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Q: How is the Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Japanese ranks #47,911 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#47,911
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 8th percentile
by Innovation Score (20.9/100): 7.2
avg claims per patent: -33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R47911 · Foreign Corporation #47,911 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #47,911/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Japan Blue Energy
CPC-NARROW A61F · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 20.9/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DOWN -33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Japan Blue Energy Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Japanese’s 20.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (30%) Velocity 3.3 pts (16%) Breadth 7.1 pts (34%) Claim depth 4.3 pts (21%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Japanese Organizatio… · this assignee

21
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Japanese's Innovation Score is 20.9/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Japanese?

Each dot is one of Japanese’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Japanese’s own 7.2 claims/patent is at or below the 9.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Japanese vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Japanese's grants concentrate

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device). By volume, Japanese sits between Japan Blue Energy Co., Ltd. and JBT Steel Industries, Inc..

Japanese's three-year grant acceleration

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Japan Blue Energy

5
Japan Chain Termi…

5
Japan Marine Unit…

5
Japana

5
Jason Toys &

5
Jast

5
JB Medical

5
JBT Steel Industr…

5
Japanese Organiza… ◀

5

What this shows Japanese holds 5 patents at rank #47,909, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Japanese

By rank, the assignees closest to #47,909 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Japanese's primary technology class.

Japanese's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%
2024	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. patent most?

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 4

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 2

A61L - Methods OR Apparatus FOR Sterilising Materials OR Objects IN GENERAL; Disinfection, Sterilisation OR Deodorisation OF AIR; Chemical Aspects OF Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical ARTICLES; Materials FOR Bandages, Dressings, Absorbent Pads OR Surgical Articles 1

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61F
Ranked #47,911 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Japanese Organization FOR Medical Device Development, Inc. against Japan Blue Energy Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 20.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.