Where does Iron Gaming Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Iron Gaming Limited ranks #47,859 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Iron Gaming Limited hold?

Iron Gaming Limited holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2024, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Iron Gaming Limited's Innovation Score?

Iron Gaming Limited has an Innovation Score of 32.9 out of 100 (43rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Iron Gaming Limited focus on?

Iron Gaming Limited's top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 5 patents, ranking #6,197 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Iron Gaming Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Iron Gaming Limited.

What does claim depth mean for Iron Gaming Limited's patents?

Iron Gaming Limited's patents average 36.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Iron Gaming Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Iron Gaming Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Iron ranks #47,859 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 8 technology areas.

#47,859
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 43rd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.9/100): 36.6
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R47859 · Foreign Corporation #47,859 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #47,859/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH IQB Information
CPC-NARROW G06F · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.9/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 36.6 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2024 · 5y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: IQB Information Technologies Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Iron’s 32.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (19%) Velocity 1.7 pts (5%) Breadth 10.0 pts (30%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (46%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Iron Gaming · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Iron's Innovation Score is 32.9/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Iron?

Each dot is one of Iron’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Iron’s own 36.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Iron vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Iron's grants concentrate

Iron Gaming Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Iron sits between IQB Information Technologies Inc. and Isotopx Ltd..

Iron's three-year grant acceleration

Iron Gaming Limited shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

IQB Information

5
IQS Group s r o

5
Iris Tech

5
Iritech

5
IS Dongseo

5
Isel

5
Isize

5
Isotopx

5
Iron Gaming ◀

5

What this shows Iron holds 5 patents at rank #47,727, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Iron

By rank, the assignees closest to #47,727 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Iron's primary technology class.

Iron's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Iron Gaming Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	20.0%
2021	3	60.0%
2024	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Iron Gaming Limited patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 5

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 2

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 2

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 2

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 2

H04M - Telephonic Communication 1

A63F - Card, Board, OR Roulette GAMES; Indoor Games Using Small Moving Playing BODIES; Video GAMES; Games NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Iron Gaming Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Iron Gaming Limited's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #47,859 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Iron Gaming Limited against IQB Information Technologies Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.