IOT Technologies LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, IOT ranks #41,026 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 13 technology areas.
- #41,026
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 32%
- by Innovation Score (42.0/100)
- 15.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R41026 · US Corporation #41,026 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #41,026/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Invivogen
- CPC-FOCUS G01M · 13 areas
- INNOV-PAR 42.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Invivogen (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How IOT’s 42.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around IOT
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IOT · this assignee
IOT · this assignee
42 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows IOT's Innovation Score is 42.0/100 (top 32% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for IOT?
Each dot is one of IOT’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IOT’s own 15.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where IOT's grants concentrate
IOT's three-year grant acceleration
IOT Technologies LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at IOT's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Invivogen
Invivogen
6 patents
- Invoxia
Invoxia
6 patents
- Iobed
Iobed Inc.
6 patents
- ION Technology So…
ION Technology Solutions, LLC
6 patents
- Ionu Security
IOnU Security, Inc.
6 patents
- IP Reserve PTY
IP Reserve PTY Ltd
6 patents
- Ipic-gold Class E…
Ipic-gold Class Entertainment, LLC
6 patents
- Iqair
Iqair AG
6 patents
- IOT ◀
IOT Technologies LLC
6 patents
What this shows IOT holds 6 patents at rank #40,918, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near IOT
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,918 in granted patent volume.
- Invivogen #40,914 · 6 patents
- Invoxia #40,915 · 6 patents
- Iobed Inc. #40,916 · 6 patents
- ION Technology Solutions, LLC #40,917 · 6 patents
- IOnU Security, Inc. #40,919 · 6 patents
- IP Reserve PTY Ltd #40,920 · 6 patents
- Ipic-gold Class Entertainment, LLC #40,921 · 6 patents
- Iqair AG #40,922 · 6 patents
Leaders in G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR Structures)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IOT's primary technology class.
- Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016, LLC 141 in class
- Aktiebolaget SKF 122 in class
- Compagnie Generale DES Etablissements Michelin 95 in class
- Rolls-royce plc 78 in class
- Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. 75 in class
- Meidensha Corporation 74 in class
- Nippon Telegraph AND Telephone Corporation 73 in class
- Horiba, Ltd. 69 in class
IOT's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
42 Top 32% higher than 68% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 66.7% |
Which technologies does IOT Technologies LLC patent most?
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
IOT Technologies LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- IOT Technologies LLC's lead technology class is G01M (Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01M
- Ranked #41,026 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare IOT Technologies LLC against Invivogen, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 42.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.