Where does IoT Diagnostics rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), IoT Diagnostics ranks #47,836 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does IoT Diagnostics hold?

IoT Diagnostics holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2023, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is IoT Diagnostics's Innovation Score?

IoT Diagnostics has an Innovation Score of 36.3 out of 100 (top 47% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does IoT Diagnostics focus on?

IoT Diagnostics's top technology area is F04B (Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps) with 3 patents, ranking #383 of 1,184 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is IoT Diagnostics's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

IoT Diagnostics's recent grant velocity is +50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for IoT Diagnostics's patents?

IoT Diagnostics's patents average 19.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the IoT Diagnostics patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

IoT Diagnostics

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F04B (Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Iot ranks #47,836 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 11 technology areas.

#47,836
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 47%
by Innovation Score (36.3/100): 19.6
avg claims per patent: +50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R47836 · US Corporation #47,836 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #47,836/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Inventronics
CPC-FOCUS F04B · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 36.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 19.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Inventronics GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Iot’s 36.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (17%) Velocity 6.7 pts (18%) Breadth 11.7 pts (32%) Claim depth 11.8 pts (32%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
IoT Diagnostics · this assignee

36
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Iot's Innovation Score is 36.3/100 (top 47% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Iot?

Each dot is one of Iot’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Iot’s own 19.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Iot vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Iot's grants concentrate

IoT Diagnostics is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under F04B (Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps). By volume, Iot sits between Inventronics GmbH and Irisity AB.

Iot's three-year grant acceleration

IoT Diagnostics shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Inventronics

5
Invertedpower Pty

5
Invetech

5
Invisawear

5
Ion Inject Techno…

5
Ionwerks

5
Ipalco B V

5
Irisity AB

5
Iot Diagnostics ◀

5

What this shows IoT holds 5 patents at rank #47,877, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near IoT

By rank, the assignees closest to #47,877 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F04B (Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in IoT's primary technology class.

Iot's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

36 Top 47% higher than 53% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

IoT Diagnostics patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	1	20.0%
2019	1	20.0%
2021	1	20.0%
2022	1	20.0%
2023	1	20.0%

Which technologies does IoT Diagnostics patent most?

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 3

G08B - Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems 3

G01M - Testing Static OR Dynamic Balance OF Machines OR STRUCTURES; Testing OF Structures OR Apparatus, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

G01L - Measuring Force, Stress, Torque, Work, Mechanical Power, Mechanical Efficiency, OR Fluid Pressure 1

G01K - Measuring TEMPERATURE; Measuring Quantity OF HEAT; Thermally-sensitive Elements NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

G01F - Measuring Volume, Volume Flow, Mass Flow OR Liquid LEVEL; Metering BY Volume 1

F04D - Non-positive-displacement Pumps 1

B01D - Separation 1

F15B - Systems Acting BY Means OF Fluids IN GENERAL; Fluid-pressure Actuators, e.g. SERVOMOTORS; Details OF Fluid-pressure Systems, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

IoT Diagnostics's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

IoT Diagnostics's lead technology class is F04B (Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F04B
Ranked #47,836 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare IoT Diagnostics against Inventronics GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 36.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.