Where does ioCurrents, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ioCurrents, Inc. ranks #29,126 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does ioCurrents, Inc. hold?

ioCurrents, Inc. holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2023, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is ioCurrents, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

ioCurrents, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 42.1 out of 100 (top 31% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does ioCurrents, Inc. focus on?

ioCurrents, Inc.'s top technology area is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models) with 6 patents, ranking #1,229 of 4,479 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is ioCurrents, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for ioCurrents, Inc..

What does claim depth mean for ioCurrents, Inc.'s patents?

ioCurrents, Inc.'s patents average 24.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the ioCurrents, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

ioCurrents, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, iocurrents ranks #29,126 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 10 technology areas.

#29,126
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 31%
by Innovation Score (42.1/100): 24.4
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R29126 · US Corporation #29,126 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #29,126/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH ibidi
CPC-FOCUS G06N · 10 areas
INNOV-PAR 42.1/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 24.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2020–2023 · 4y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: ibidi GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How iocurrents’s 42.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (19%) Velocity 8.3 pts (20%) Breadth 11.2 pts (27%) Claim depth 14.7 pts (35%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
ioCurrents · this assignee

42
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows iocurrents's Innovation Score is 42.1/100 (top 31% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for iocurrents?

Each dot is one of iocurrents’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). iocurrents’s own 24.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

iocurrents vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where iocurrents's grants concentrate

ioCurrents, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, iocurrents sits between iTeos Therapeutics SA and oGorgeous Inc..

iocurrents's three-year grant acceleration

ioCurrents, Inc. shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

iteos Therapeutics

9
ibidi

9
instagrid

9
instraction

9
iodyne

9
mimish

9
moovel North Amer…

9
ogorgeous

9
iocurrents ◀

9

What this shows ioCurrents holds 9 patents at rank #30,687, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near ioCurrents

By rank, the assignees closest to #30,687 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in ioCurrents's primary technology class.

iocurrents's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 31% higher than 69% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

ioCurrents, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	2	22.2%
2021	2	22.2%
2022	4	44.4%
2023	1	11.1%

Which technologies does ioCurrents, Inc. patent most?

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 6

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 4

G01C - Measuring Distances, Levels OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; Gyroscopic INSTRUMENTS; Photogrammetry OR Videogrammetry 2

G08B - Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems 2

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 2

H04Q - Selecting 2

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 2

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 2

G07C - Time OR Attendance REGISTERS; Registering OR Indicating THE Working OF MACHINES; Generating Random NUMBERS; Voting OR Lottery APPARATUS; Arrangements, Systems OR Apparatus FOR Checking NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 2

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

ioCurrents, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

ioCurrents, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06N
Ranked #29,126 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare ioCurrents, Inc. against iTeos Therapeutics SA, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 42.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.