instagrid GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, instagrid ranks #29,089 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #29,089
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 42%
- by Innovation Score (38.1/100)
- 5.1
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R29089 · Foreign Corporation #29,089 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #29,089/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH ibidi
- CPC-NARROW H01M · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 38.1/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2023–2025 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: ibidi GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How instagrid’s 38.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around instagrid
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- instagrid · this assignee
instagrid · this assignee
38 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows instagrid's Innovation Score is 38.1/100 (top 42% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for instagrid?
Each dot is one of instagrid’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). instagrid’s own 5.1 claims/patent is at or below the 19.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where instagrid's grants concentrate
instagrid GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 22.2% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). By volume, instagrid sits between iPierian, Inc. and mimish, Inc..
instagrid's three-year grant acceleration
instagrid GmbH shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at instagrid's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- ipierian
iPierian, Inc.
9 patents
- ischemaview
iSchemaView, Inc.
9 patents
- iteos Therapeutics
iTeos Therapeutics SA
9 patents
- ibidi
ibidi GmbH
9 patents
- instraction
instrAction GmbH
9 patents
- iocurrents
ioCurrents, Inc.
9 patents
- iodyne
iodyne, LLC
9 patents
- mimish
mimish, Inc.
9 patents
- instagrid ◀
instagrid GmbH
9 patents
What this shows instagrid holds 9 patents at rank #30,685, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near instagrid
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,685 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in instagrid's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,657 in class
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 3,097 in class
- LG Chem, Ltd. 2,369 in class
- LG Energy Solution, Ltd. 2,086 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 1,418 in class
- Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. 1,278 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 1,185 in class
- Robert Bosch GmbH 1,074 in class
instagrid's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 42% higher than 58% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2023–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2024 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2025partial year | 5 | 55.6% |
Which technologies does instagrid GmbH patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
instagrid GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- instagrid GmbH's lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 22.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
- Ranked #29,089 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare instagrid GmbH against iPierian, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 38.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.