Interventional Spine, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Interventional ranks #26,588 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #26,588
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 25th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.8/100)
- 18.1
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R26588 · US Corporation #26,588 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #26,588/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Interacoustics A/S
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Interacoustics A/S (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Interventional’s 27.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Interventional
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Interventional Spine · this assignee 28
Interventional Spine · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Interventional's Innovation Score is 27.8/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Interventional?
Each dot is one of Interventional’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Interventional’s own 18.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Interventional's grants concentrate
Interventional Spine, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 90% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Interventional sits between Interacoustics A/S and Ipass Inc..
Who files at Interventional's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Interacoustics A/S
Interacoustics A/S
10 patents
- Interface Biologi…
Interface Biologics, Inc.
10 patents
- International Cen…
International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB)
10 patents
- Interpace Diagnos…
Interpace Diagnostics Corporation
10 patents
- Intrinsic Value
Intrinsic Value, LLC
10 patents
- Invectys
Invectys
10 patents
- Iontra
Iontra Inc
10 patents
- Ipass
Ipass Inc.
10 patents
- Interventional Sp… ◀
Interventional Spine, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows Interventional holds 10 patents at rank #26,603, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Interventional
By rank, the assignees closest to #26,603 in granted patent volume.
- Interacoustics A/S #26,599 · 10 patents
- Interface Biologics, Inc. #26,600 · 10 patents
- International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) #26,601 · 10 patents
- Interpace Diagnostics Corporation #26,602 · 10 patents
- Intrinsic Value, LLC #26,604 · 10 patents
- Invectys #26,605 · 10 patents
- Iontra Inc #26,606 · 10 patents
- Ipass Inc. #26,607 · 10 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Interventional's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Interventional's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2016 | 6 | 60.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does Interventional Spine, Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Interventional Spine, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Interventional Spine, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 90% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #26,588 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Interventional Spine, Inc. against Interacoustics A/S, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.