Overall rank by patents
#24,561
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 20 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Institute ranks #24,561 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 11 patents across 20 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R24561 · Foreign Corporation #24,561 · 11 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Innovative MED Concepts, Llc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Institute OF FOOD Sc… · this assignee
45 score
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Institute's Innovation Score is 45.4/100 (top 23% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Institute OF FOOD Science AND Technology, Chinese Academy OF Agricultural Sciences is a focused PatentsView assignee: 20 CPC subclasses with 27.3% of grants classified under G01N (INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Institute sits between Innovative MED Concepts, Llc. and Integrated Nano-technologies, Inc..
Institute OF FOOD Science AND Technology, Chinese Academy OF Agricultural Sciences shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
INNOVATIVE MED CONCEPTS, LLC.
11 patents
INSIDESALES.COM
11 patents
INSTITUT MINES TELECOM/TELECOM BRETAGNE
11 patents
INSTITUTE OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES CHINESE ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
11 patents
INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH ATOMIC ENERGY COUNCIL, R.O.C.
11 patents
INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
11 patents
INTEGRATED COMPOSITE PRODUCTS, INC.
11 patents
INTEGRATED NANO-TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
11 patents
INSTITUTE OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
11 patents
What this shows Institute holds 11 patents at rank #24,523, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #24,523 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Institute's primary technology class.
Institute's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 23% higher than 77% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2023 | 5 | 45.5% |
| 2024 | 2 | 18.2% |
Top 15 of 20 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,561
of 50,000 tracked assignees
45.4 out of 100
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.