Ingamar Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Ingamar ranks #47,677 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #47,677
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 17th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.3/100)
- 10.6
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47677 · Foreign Corporation #47,677 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,677/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Inergy Holdings
- CPC-NARROW E05B · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.3/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Inergy Holdings, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Ingamar’s 25.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Ingamar
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Ingamar · this assignee 25
Ingamar · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Ingamar's Innovation Score is 25.3/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Ingamar?
Each dot is one of Ingamar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Ingamar’s own 10.6 claims/patent is at or below the 13.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Ingamar's grants concentrate
Ingamar Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs). By volume, Ingamar sits between Inergy Holdings, LLC and Inlc Technology Co., Ltd.,.
Ingamar's three-year grant acceleration
Ingamar Co., Ltd. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Ingamar's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Inergy Holdings
Inergy Holdings, LLC
5 patents
- Infac Elecs
Infac Elecs Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Infiltrator Syste…
Infiltrator Systems Inc
5 patents
- Infotech Internat…
Infotech International LLC
5 patents
- Init Innovative I…
Init Innovative Informatikanwendungen IN Transport-, Verkehrs- UND Leitsystemen GMBH
5 patents
- INK Projects
INK Projects LLC
5 patents
- Inland Pipe Rehab…
Inland Pipe Rehabilitation LLC
5 patents
- Inlc Technology
Inlc Technology Co., Ltd.,
5 patents
- Ingamar ◀
Ingamar Co., Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows Ingamar holds 5 patents at rank #47,636, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Ingamar
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,636 in granted patent volume.
- Inergy Holdings, LLC #47,632 · 5 patents
- Infac Elecs Co., Ltd. #47,633 · 5 patents
- Infiltrator Systems Inc #47,634 · 5 patents
- Infotech International LLC #47,635 · 5 patents
- Init Innovative Informatikanwendungen IN Transport-, Verkehrs- UND Leitsystemen GMBH #47,637 · 5 patents
- INK Projects LLC #47,638 · 5 patents
- Inland Pipe Rehabilitation LLC #47,639 · 5 patents
- Inlc Technology Co., Ltd., #47,640 · 5 patents
Leaders in E05B (Locks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Ingamar's primary technology class.
Ingamar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Ingamar Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Ingamar Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ingamar Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E05B
- Ranked #47,677 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Ingamar Co., Ltd. against Inergy Holdings, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.