Overall rank by patents
#32,093
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 9 technology areas, active 2015–2017. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06V (IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING).
The verdict
Industrial holds 8 US patents across 9 technology areas, rank #32,093 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Industrial Perception, Inc. has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2015 and 2017, placing Industrial Perception, Inc. at rank #32,093 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 9 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06V (IMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING). As a US Corporation, Industrial Perception, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Industrial sits between Indiggo Llc (8 patents, rank #32,089) and Informetis Corporation (8 patents, rank #32,097) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Industrial Perception, Inc.'s 21.0 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while concentration in 9 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Industrial Perception, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Indiggo LLC
8 patents
Indigo Diabetes N.V.
8 patents
Indusco, Ltd.
8 patents
Industrial Galvanizers Corporation Pty Ltd.
8 patents
Industries Lassonde Inc.
8 patents
Industries Mailhot Inc.
8 patents
InflowControl AS
8 patents
Informetis Corporation
8 patents
Industrial Perception, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Industrial holds 8 patents at rank #32,093, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,093 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Industrial's primary technology class.
Industrial's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 64% higher than 36% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2016 | 5 | 62.5% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#32,093
Across all tracked assignees
30.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Industrial's 8 grants land it in the top 64% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.