Imig, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Imig ranks #47,617 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #47,617
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 1st percentile
- by Innovation Score (10.4/100)
- 1.2
- avg claims per patent
- -75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47617 · US Corporation #47,617 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,617/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Imabiotech
- CPC-NARROW H01R · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 10.4/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Imabiotech (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Imig’s 10.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Imig
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Imig · this assignee 10
Imig · this assignee
10 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Imig's Innovation Score is 10.4/100 (1st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Imig?
Each dot is one of Imig’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Imig’s own 1.2 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Imig's grants concentrate
Imig, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 20% of grants classified under H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Imig sits between Imabiotech and Impact Technologies, LLC.
Who files at Imig's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Imabiotech
Imabiotech
5 patents
- Imactis
Imactis
5 patents
- Imago Pharmaceuti…
Imago Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
5 patents
- Imal S R L
Imal S.R.L.
5 patents
- Immerson
Immerson Corporation
5 patents
- Immunex
Immunex Corporation
5 patents
- Immunicom
Immunicom Inc.
5 patents
- Impact
Impact Technologies, LLC
5 patents
- Imig ◀
Imig, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Imig holds 5 patents at rank #47,610, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Imig
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,610 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H01R (Electrically-conductive Connections)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Imig's primary technology class.
- Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd. 1,543 in class
- Yazaki Corporation 1,482 in class
- Foxconn Interconnect Technology Limited 847 in class
- Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. 729 in class
- Autonetworks Technologies, Ltd. 694 in class
- Molex, LLC 599 in class
- Japan Aviation Electronics Industry, Limited 523 in class
- TE Connectivity Co. Ltd. 459 in class
Imig's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
10 1st percentile higher than 1% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Imig, Inc. patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Imig, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Imig, Inc.'s lead technology class is H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors), 20% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01R
- Ranked #47,617 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Imig, Inc. against Imabiotech, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 10.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.