Where does Imagry Israel Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Imagry Israel Ltd. ranks #40,863 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Imagry Israel Ltd. hold?

Imagry Israel Ltd. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2024, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is Imagry Israel Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Imagry Israel Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 33.7 out of 100 (45th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Imagry Israel Ltd. focus on?

Imagry Israel Ltd.'s top technology area is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models) with 4 patents, ranking #1,655 of 4,479 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is Imagry Israel Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Imagry Israel Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is +100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Imagry Israel Ltd.'s patents?

Imagry Israel Ltd.'s patents average 17.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Imagry Israel Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Imagry Israel Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Imagry ranks #40,863 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 8 technology areas.

#40,863
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 45th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.7/100): 17.2
avg claims per patent: +100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R40863 · Foreign Corporation #40,863 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #40,863/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Illuminate Consulting
CPC-NARROW G06N · 8 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.7/100
CLAIMS-RICH 17.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Illuminate Consulting, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Imagry’s 33.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (20%) Velocity 6.7 pts (20%) Breadth 10.0 pts (30%) Claim depth 10.3 pts (31%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Imagry Israel · this assignee

34
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Imagry's Innovation Score is 33.7/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Imagry?

Each dot is one of Imagry’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Imagry’s own 17.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Imagry vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Imagry's grants concentrate

Imagry Israel Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Imagry sits between Illuminate Consulting, LLC and IMO Industries Inc..

Imagry's three-year grant acceleration

Imagry Israel Ltd. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Illuminate Consul…

6
Illumitex

6
Image

6
Imagoworks

6
Imedisync

6
Immerz

6
Immunic

6
IMO Industries

6
Imagry Israel ◀

6

What this shows Imagry holds 6 patents at rank #40,837, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Imagry

By rank, the assignees closest to #40,837 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Imagry's primary technology class.

Imagry's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Imagry Israel Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	33.3%
2021	1	16.7%
2022	1	16.7%
2023	1	16.7%
2024	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Imagry Israel Ltd. patent most?

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 4

G06V - Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding 3

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 3

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 3

G05B - Control OR Regulating Systems IN GENERAL; Functional Elements OF Such SYSTEMS; Monitoring OR Testing Arrangements FOR Such Systems OR Elements 3

B60W - Conjoint Control OF Vehicle Sub-units OF Different Type OR Different FUNCTION; Control Systems Specially Adapted FOR Hybrid VEHICLES; Road Vehicle Drive Control Systems FOR Purposes NOT Related TO THE Control OF A Particular Sub-unit 2

G01C - Measuring Distances, Levels OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; Gyroscopic INSTRUMENTS; Photogrammetry OR Videogrammetry 2

G05D - Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Imagry Israel Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Imagry Israel Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06N
Ranked #40,863 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Imagry Israel Ltd. against Illuminate Consulting, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.