Idealab
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F24S (Solar Heat COLLECTORS; Solar Heat Systems).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Idealab ranks #47,586 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #47,586
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 41%
- by Innovation Score (38.3/100)
- 13.6
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47586 · US Corporation #47,586 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,586/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Iconics
- CPC-NARROW F24S · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 38.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Iconics, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Idealab’s 38.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Idealab
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Idealab · this assignee
Idealab · this assignee
38 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Idealab's Innovation Score is 38.3/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Idealab?
Each dot is one of Idealab’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Idealab’s own 13.6 claims/patent is at or below the 16.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Idealab's grants concentrate
Idealab is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under F24S (Solar Heat COLLECTORS; Solar Heat Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Idealab sits between Iconics, Inc. and Imagine Intelligent Materials Limited.
Idealab's three-year grant acceleration
Idealab shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Idealab's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Iconics
Iconics, Inc.
5 patents
- Icosagen Cell Fac…
Icosagen Cell Factory OÜ
5 patents
- Ideal Conceal
Ideal Conceal Inc.
5 patents
- Ideal Jacobs
Ideal Jacobs Corp.
5 patents
- Idemia America
Idemia America Corp.
5 patents
- Ikonopedia
Ikonopedia, Inc.
5 patents
- Image Analyser
Image Analyser Ltd.
5 patents
- Imagine Intellige…
Imagine Intelligent Materials Limited
5 patents
- Idealab ◀
Idealab
5 patents
What this shows Idealab holds 5 patents at rank #47,753, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Idealab
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,753 in granted patent volume.
- Iconics, Inc. #47,749 · 5 patents
- Icosagen Cell Factory OÜ #47,750 · 5 patents
- Ideal Conceal Inc. #47,751 · 5 patents
- Ideal Jacobs Corp. #47,752 · 5 patents
- Idemia America Corp. #47,754 · 5 patents
- Ikonopedia, Inc. #47,755 · 5 patents
- Image Analyser Ltd. #47,756 · 5 patents
- Imagine Intelligent Materials Limited #47,757 · 5 patents
Leaders in F24S (Solar Heat Collectors)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Idealab's primary technology class.
Idealab's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Idealab patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Idealab's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Idealab's lead technology class is F24S (Solar Heat COLLECTORS; Solar Heat Systems), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F24S
- Ranked #47,586 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Idealab against Iconics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 38.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.