Overall rank by patents
#40,816
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, active 2018–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: Y02A (TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE).
The verdict
Id-fish holds 6 US patents across 6 technology areas, rank #40,816 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Id-fish Technology, Inc. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2018 and 2025, placing Id-fish Technology, Inc. at rank #40,816 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 6 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.8 claims per patent with primary concentration in Y02A (TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE). As a US Corporation, Id-fish Technology, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Id-fish sits between Icharts, Inc. (6 patents, rank #40,812) and Ideol (6 patents, rank #40,820) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 2 in the 2015–2019 window, a +100% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Id-fish Technology, Inc.'s 13.8 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 6 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Id-fish Technology, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
ICHARTS, INC.
6 patents
ICM (Institut Du Cerveau Et De La Moellle Épiniére)
6 patents
ICN ACQUISITION, LLC
6 patents
ICP Medical, LLC
6 patents
IDEACURIA INC.
6 patents
IDEAL STAR INC.
6 patents
IDENTITY THEFT GUARD SOLUTIONS, INC.
6 patents
IDEOL
6 patents
ID-Fish Technology, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Id-fish holds 6 patents at rank #40,816, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,816 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Id-fish's primary technology class.
Id-fish's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 Top 66% higher than 34% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2025 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#40,816
Across all tracked assignees
30.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Id-fish's 6 grants land it in the top 66% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.