Where does Honeycomb Battery Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Honeycomb Battery Company ranks #12,043 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Honeycomb Battery Company hold?

Honeycomb Battery Company holds 25 US utility patents granted between 2024 and 2025, spanning 13 technology areas.

What is Honeycomb Battery Company's Innovation Score?

Honeycomb Battery Company has an Innovation Score of 56.0 out of 100 (top 6% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Honeycomb Battery Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Honeycomb Battery Company.

What does claim depth mean for Honeycomb Battery Company's patents?

Honeycomb Battery Company's patents average 20.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Honeycomb Battery Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Honeycomb Battery Company

Q: What technology areas does Honeycomb Battery Company focus on?

Honeycomb Battery Company's top technology area is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy) with 25 patents, ranking #270 of 2,332 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 13 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2024–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Honeycomb ranks #12,043 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 13 technology areas.

#12,043
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 6%
by Innovation Score (56.0/100): 20.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12043 · US Corporation #12,043 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
UPPER-Q #12,043/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Hermes Innovations
CPC-FOCUS H01M · 13 areas
INNOV-PAR 56.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 20.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
SPAN-YRS 2024–2025 · 2y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Hermes Innovations, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Honeycomb’s 56.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.3 pts (20%) Velocity 20.0 pts (36%) Breadth 12.7 pts (23%) Claim depth 12.0 pts (21%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Charles Schwab & · near

56
Honeycomb Battery · this assignee

56
Razer (Asia-Pacific)… · near

56
ResMed Sensor · near

56
Velocys · near

56
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Honeycomb's Innovation Score is 56.0/100 (top 6% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Honeycomb?

Each dot is one of Honeycomb’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Honeycomb’s own 20.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 18.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Honeycomb vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Honeycomb's grants concentrate

Honeycomb Battery Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). By volume, Honeycomb sits between Hermes Innovations, LLC and Ichor Systems, Inc..

Honeycomb's three-year grant acceleration

Honeycomb Battery Company shows 14 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Hermes Innovations

25
Hiddenlayer

25
Highres Biosoluti…

25
Homewerks Worldwi…

25
Huber Engineered…

25
Huron Internation…

25
Hyprotek

25
Ichor Systems

25
Honeycomb Battery ◀

25

What this shows Honeycomb holds 25 patents at rank #12,046, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Honeycomb

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,046 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Honeycomb's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Honeycomb, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In H01M (Processes OR Means), Honeycomb ranks #270 of 2,332 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (56 here).

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. 56 Velocys Technologies Ltd 56 ResMed Sensor Technologies Limited 56 Razer (Asia-Pacific) Pte. Ltd. 56

Honeycomb's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

56 Top 6% higher than 94% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2024–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2024–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Honeycomb Battery Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2024	14	56.0%
2025partial year	11	44.0%

Which technologies does Honeycomb Battery Company patent most?

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 25

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 25

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 4

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 2

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 1

B60L - Propulsion OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Supplying Electric Power FOR Auxiliary Equipment OF Electrically-propelled Vehicles ; Electrodynamic Brake Systems FOR Vehicles IN General ; Magnetic Suspension OR Levitation FOR VEHICLES; Monitoring Operating Variables OF Electrically-propelled Vehicl 1

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 1

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 1

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 1

C08G - Macromolecular Compounds Obtained Otherwise Than BY Reactions Only Involving Unsaturated Carbon-to-carbon Bonds 1

C01G - Compounds Containing Metals NOT Covered BY Subclasses C01d OR C01f 1

Top 13 of 13 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Honeycomb Battery Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Honeycomb Battery Company's lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
Ranked #12,043 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Honeycomb Battery Company against Hermes Innovations, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 56.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.