Overall rank by patents
#12,043
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2024–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Honeycomb ranks #12,043 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 13 technology areas.
Honeycomb Battery Company has been granted 25 US utility patents between 2024 and 2025, placing Honeycomb Battery Company at #12,043 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 13 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 20.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in H01M (PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY). As a US Corporation, Honeycomb Battery Company is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Honeycomb sits between Hermes Innovations, Llc (25 patents, rank #12,042) and Ichor Systems, Inc. (25 patents, rank #12,050) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 56.0/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Historical data spans 2024 through 2025, with 25 total grants over that period. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Honeycomb Battery Company's 20.0 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 13 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Hermes Innovations, LLC
25 patents
HiddenLayer, Inc.
25 patents
HighRes Biosolutions, Inc.
25 patents
Homewerks Worldwide, LLC
25 patents
Huber Engineered Woods LLC
25 patents
Huron Technologies International Inc.
25 patents
Hyprotek, Inc.
25 patents
ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC.
25 patents
Honeycomb Battery Company
25 patents
What this shows Honeycomb holds 25 patents at rank #12,046, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #12,046 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Honeycomb's primary technology class.
Honeycomb's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
56 Top 6% higher than 94% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2024–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14 | 56.0% |
| 2025partial year | 11 | 44.0% |
Top 13 of 13 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#12,043
of 50,000 tracked assignees
56.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Honeycomb's 25 grants land it in the top 6% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.