H&L Tooth Company
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, H&l ranks #40,717 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #40,717
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (14.4/100)
- 6.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R40717 · US Corporation #40,717 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #40,717/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Guizhou Zhenhua E-Chem
- CPC-NARROW E02F · 1 areas
- INNOV-LOW 14.4/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Guizhou Zhenhua E-Chem Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How H&l’s 14.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around H&l
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- H&L Tooth · this assignee 14
H&L Tooth · this assignee
14 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows H&l's Innovation Score is 14.4/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for H&l?
Each dot is one of H&l’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). H&l’s own 6.8 claims/patent is at or below the 13.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where H&l's grants concentrate
H&L Tooth Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, H&l sits between Guizhou Zhenhua E-Chem Inc. and HAE Kwang Co., Ltd..
Who files at H&L's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Guizhou Zhenhua E…
Guizhou Zhenhua E-Chem Inc.
6 patents
- Gustomsc Resource…
GustoMSC Resources B.V.
6 patents
- H - 07 SRL
H - 07 SRL
6 patents
- H Quest Partners
H Quest Partners, LP
6 patents
- H&smotorsports
H&smotorsports, LLC
6 patents
- H C Duke & Son
H.C. Duke & Son, LLC
6 patents
- H3alth
H3alth Technologies Inc.
6 patents
- HAE Kwang
HAE Kwang Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- H&L Tooth ◀
H&L Tooth Company
6 patents
What this shows H&L holds 6 patents at rank #40,577, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near H&L
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,577 in granted patent volume.
- Guizhou Zhenhua E-Chem Inc. #40,573 · 6 patents
- GustoMSC Resources B.V. #40,574 · 6 patents
- H - 07 SRL #40,575 · 6 patents
- H Quest Partners, LP #40,576 · 6 patents
- H&smotorsports, LLC #40,578 · 6 patents
- H.C. Duke & Son, LLC #40,579 · 6 patents
- H3alth Technologies Inc. #40,580 · 6 patents
- HAE Kwang Co., Ltd. #40,581 · 6 patents
Leaders in E02F (Dredging)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in H&L's primary technology class.
- Caterpillar Inc. 1,041 in class
- Komatsu Ltd. 910 in class
- Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. 595 in class
- Deere & Company 487 in class
- Kubota Corporation 320 in class
- Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd 250 in class
- Volvo Construction Equipment AB 198 in class
- CNH Industrial America LLC 178 in class
H&l's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
14 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does H&L Tooth Company patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
H&L Tooth Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- H&L Tooth Company's lead technology class is E02F (DREDGING; Soil-shifting), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E02F
- Ranked #40,717 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare H&L Tooth Company against Guizhou Zhenhua E-Chem Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 14.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.