USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 32 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F21W (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO Uses OR Applications OF Lighting Devices OR Systems).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Herbert ranks #9,787 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 32 patents across 12 technology areas.

#9,787
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 36%
by Innovation Score (40.1/100)
4.0
avg claims per patent
-72%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R9787 · Foreign Corporation #9,787 · 32 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 32 grants
  • UPPER-Q #9,787/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Gynesonics
  • CPC-FOCUS F21W · 12 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 40.1/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -72% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Gynesonics, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Herbert’s 40.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Herbert

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Herbert's Innovation Score is 40.1/100 (top 36% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Herbert?

Each dot is one of Herbert’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Herbert’s own 4.0 claims/patent is at or below the 9.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Herbert vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 31.932.032.03232.032.032.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Gynesonics, Inc. - 32, 22GynesonicsHamanakodenso Co., Ltd. - 32, 9.69HamanakodensoHanwit Precision Industries Ltd. - 32, 9.59Hanwit Precision…Heesung Catalysts Corporation - 32, 8.56Heesung CatalystsHirosaki University - 32, 8.5Hirosaki Universi…Haldex Brake Products AB - 32, 17.62Haldex Brake Prod…Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Limited - 32, 19.97Halliburton Manuf…Harima Chemicals, Incorporated - 32, 9.25Harima Chemicals…Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG - 32, 4.03Herbert Waldmann…
Herbert vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Herbert's grants concentrate

Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 12.5% of grants classified under F21W (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO Uses OR Applications OF Lighting Devices OR Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Herbert sits between Gynesonics, Inc. and Harima Chemicals, Incorporated.

Herbert's three-year grant acceleration

Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Herbert's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Herbert holds 32 patents at rank #9,782, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Herbert

By rank, the assignees closest to #9,782 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F21W (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Herbert's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Herbert, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F21W (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k), Herbert ranks #190 of 722 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Herbert's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 36% higher than 64% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 201520162017201820192020202220232024 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 3 9.4%
2016 6 18.8%
2017 5 15.6%
2018 9 28.1%
2019 2 6.3%
2020 1 3.1%
2022 3 9.4%
2023 2 6.3%
2024 1 3.1%

Which technologies does Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG patent most?

Top 12 of 12 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG's lead technology class is F21W (Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclasses F21k, F21l, F21s and F21v, Relating TO Uses OR Applications OF Lighting Devices OR Systems), 12.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F21W
  • Ranked #9,787 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Herbert Waldmann GMBH & Co. KG against Gynesonics, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 40.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.