Hard Core Brands International LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01M (Catching, Trapping OR Scaring OF Animals ; Apparatus FOR THE Destruction OF Noxious Animals OR Noxious Plants).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Hard ranks #35,639 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #35,639
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 11th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.7/100)
- 11.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35639 · US Corporation #35,639 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,639/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Hank Technology
- CPC-NARROW A01M · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.7/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 11.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Hank Technology LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Hard’s 22.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Hard
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Hard Core Brands… · this assignee 23
Hard Core Brands… · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Hard's Innovation Score is 22.7/100 (11th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Hard?
Each dot is one of Hard’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Hard’s own 11.4 claims/patent is at or below the 12.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Hard's grants concentrate
Hard Core Brands International LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under A01M (Catching, Trapping OR Scaring OF Animals ; Apparatus FOR THE Destruction OF Noxious Animals OR Noxious Plants). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, Hard sits between Hank Technology LLC and Harvest Tec, Inc..
Who files at Hard's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Hank Technology
Hank Technology LLC
7 patents
- Hanon Systems Bad…
Hanon Systems Bad Homburg GmbH
7 patents
- Hans Künz
Hans Künz GmbH
7 patents
- Harbour Star Inte…
Harbour Star International Limited
7 patents
- Harmony Developme…
Harmony Development Group, Inc.
7 patents
- Harry Miller
Harry Miller Co., LLC
7 patents
- Hartman Design
Hartman Design, Inc.
7 patents
- Harvest Tec
Harvest Tec, Inc.
7 patents
- Hard Core Brands… ◀
Hard Core Brands International LLC
7 patents
What this shows Hard holds 7 patents at rank #35,703, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Hard
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,703 in granted patent volume.
- Hank Technology LLC #35,699 · 7 patents
- Hanon Systems Bad Homburg GmbH #35,700 · 7 patents
- Hans Künz GmbH #35,701 · 7 patents
- Harbour Star International Limited #35,702 · 7 patents
- Harmony Development Group, Inc. #35,704 · 7 patents
- Harry Miller Co., LLC #35,705 · 7 patents
- Hartman Design, Inc. #35,706 · 7 patents
- Harvest Tec, Inc. #35,707 · 7 patents
Leaders in A01M (Catching)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Hard's primary technology class.
Hard's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 11th percentile higher than 11% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2016 | 5 | 71.4% |
Which technologies does Hard Core Brands International LLC patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Hard Core Brands International LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Hard Core Brands International LLC's lead technology class is A01M (Catching, Trapping OR Scaring OF Animals ; Apparatus FOR THE Destruction OF Noxious Animals OR Noxious Plants), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01M
- Ranked #35,639 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Hard Core Brands International LLC against Hank Technology LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.