PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2024–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G09G (ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
10
Total patents granted
10
CPC technology areas
14.3
Avg claims per patent
-
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Haining holds 10 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #26,466 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#26,466
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 17%
by Innovation Score (48.0/100)
14.3
avg claims per patent

Portfolio overview

Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2024 and 2025, placing Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. at rank #26,466 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in G09G (ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION). As a Foreign Corporation, Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Haining sits between Hackensack University Medical Center (10 patents, rank #26,462) and Hanergy Hi-tech Power (hk) Limited (10 patents, rank #26,470) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2024 through 2025, with 10 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd.'s 14.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Haining's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Haining holds 10 patents at rank #26,466, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Haining's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

48 Top 17% higher than 83% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). Below this entry. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Below this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). This entry sits in this band. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

3.544.555.566.5 20242025 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2024–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2024–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2024 6 60.0%
2025 4 40.0%

Which technologies does Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. patent most?

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#26,466

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

48.0 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. hold?
Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. holds 10 US granted patents filed between 2024 and 2025, spanning 10 technology areas.
What is Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd.'s Innovation Score?
Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 48.0 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. focus on?
Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd.'s top technology area is G09G (ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION) with 6 patents. The company has filed patents in 10 CPC subclasses total.
Is Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd..
What does claim depth mean for Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd.'s patents?
Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd.'s patents average 14.3 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Haining Eswin IC Design Co., Ltd. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Haining's 10 grants land it in the top 17% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Haining ranks #26,466 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in G09G - see who else leads that technology area. G09G leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.