Where does H2W rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), H2W ranks #35,608 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does H2W hold?

H2W holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is H2W's Innovation Score?

H2W has an Innovation Score of 26.9 out of 100 (22nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does H2W focus on?

H2W's top technology area is A41G (Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers) with 4 patents, ranking #12 of 37 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is H2W's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

H2W's recent grant velocity is +150% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for H2W's patents?

H2W's patents average 7.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the H2W patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

H2W

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A41G (Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, H2W ranks #35,608 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 2 technology areas.

#35,608
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 22nd percentile
by Innovation Score (26.9/100): 7.9
avg claims per patent: +150%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R35608 · US Corporation #35,608 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #35,608/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH H Quest Vanguard
CPC-NARROW A41G · 2 areas
INNOV-THIN 26.9/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +150% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: H Quest Vanguard, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How H2W’s 26.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (27%) Velocity 10.0 pts (37%) Breadth 5.0 pts (19%) Claim depth 4.7 pts (17%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
H2W · this assignee

27
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows H2W's Innovation Score is 26.9/100 (22nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for H2W?

Each dot is one of H2W’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). H2W’s own 7.9 claims/patent is at or below the 12.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

H2W vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where H2W's grants concentrate

H2W is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under A41G (Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, H2W sits between H & S Manufacturing Co., Inc. and Hands Corporation Ltd..

H2W's three-year grant acceleration

H2W shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

H & S Manufacturi…

7
H Quest Vanguard

7
H&D Electrics

7
H C Starck Soluti…

7
Hamad BIN Khalifa…

7
Hamaton Automotiv…

7
Hamlin (Suzhou)

7
Hands

7
H2W ◀

7

What this shows H2W holds 7 patents at rank #35,602, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near H2W

By rank, the assignees closest to #35,602 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A41G (Artificial Flowers)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in H2W's primary technology class.

H2W's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

27 22nd percentile higher than 22% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

H2W patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	14.3%
2016	1	14.3%
2020	2	28.6%
2022	1	14.3%
2023	2	28.6%

Which technologies does H2W patent most?

A41G - Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers 4

G02C - SPECTACLES; Sunglasses OR Goggles Insofar AS They Have THE Same Features AS SPECTACLES; Contact Lenses 4

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

H2W's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

H2W's lead technology class is A41G (Artificial FLOWERS; WIGS; MASKS; Feathers), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A41G
Ranked #35,608 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare H2W against H & S Manufacturing Co., Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 26.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.

H2W