GreenStract, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 17 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B09C (Reclamation OF Contaminated Soil).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Greenstract ranks #47,193 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 17 technology areas.
- #47,193
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 48%
- by Innovation Score (35.8/100)
- 40.4
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47193 · US Corporation #47,193 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,193/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Green Materials
- CPC-FOCUS B09C · 17 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.8/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 40.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Green Materials, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Greenstract’s 35.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Greenstract
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- GreenStract · this assignee
GreenStract · this assignee
36 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Greenstract's Innovation Score is 35.8/100 (top 48% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Greenstract?
Each dot is one of Greenstract’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Greenstract’s own 40.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Greenstract's grants concentrate
GreenStract, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 17 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B09C (Reclamation OF Contaminated Soil). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Greenstract sits between Green Materials, LLC and Greentouch USA, Inc..
Who files at GreenStract's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Green Materials
Green Materials, LLC
5 patents
- Green Powerset
Green Powerset Co., Ltd
5 patents
- Green Vision Syst…
Green Vision Systems Ltd.
5 patents
- Greenfire Energy
GreenFire Energy Inc.
5 patents
- Greene Lyon Group
Greene Lyon Group, Inc.
5 patents
- Greenerity
Greenerity GmbH
5 patents
- Greenkeepers
Greenkeepers, Inc.
5 patents
- Greentouch USA
Greentouch USA, Inc.
5 patents
- Greenstract ◀
GreenStract, LLC
5 patents
What this shows GreenStract holds 5 patents at rank #47,238, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near GreenStract
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,238 in granted patent volume.
- Green Materials, LLC #47,234 · 5 patents
- Green Powerset Co., Ltd #47,235 · 5 patents
- Green Vision Systems Ltd. #47,236 · 5 patents
- GreenFire Energy Inc. #47,237 · 5 patents
- Greene Lyon Group, Inc. #47,239 · 5 patents
- Greenerity GmbH #47,240 · 5 patents
- Greenkeepers, Inc. #47,241 · 5 patents
- Greentouch USA, Inc. #47,242 · 5 patents
Leaders in B09C (Reclamation OF Contaminated Soil)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in GreenStract's primary technology class.
- Oxytec LLC 12 in class
- Remediation Products, Inc. 11 in class
- Loci Controls, Inc. 10 in class
- Specialty Earth Sciences, LLC 10 in class
- Chinese Research Academy OF Environmental Sciences 9 in class
- Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. 7 in class
- Regenesis Bioremediation Products 7 in class
- Tersus Environmental LLC 6 in class
Greenstract's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
36 Top 48% higher than 52% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does GreenStract, LLC patent most?
Top 15 of 17 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
GreenStract, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- GreenStract, LLC's lead technology class is B09C (Reclamation OF Contaminated Soil), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B09C
- Ranked #47,193 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare GreenStract, LLC against Green Materials, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.