Where does GEO. M. Martin Company rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), GEO. M. Martin Company ranks #40,404 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does GEO. M. Martin Company hold?

GEO. M. Martin Company holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2022, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is GEO. M. Martin Company's Innovation Score?

GEO. M. Martin Company has an Innovation Score of 31.4 out of 100 (38th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does GEO. M. Martin Company focus on?

GEO. M. Martin Company's top technology area is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing) with 4 patents, ranking #92 of 595 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is GEO. M. Martin Company's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

GEO. M. Martin Company's recent grant velocity is -50% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for GEO. M. Martin Company's patents?

GEO. M. Martin Company's patents average 22.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the GEO. M. Martin Company patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

GEO. M. Martin Company

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Geo. ranks #40,404 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.

#40,404
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 38th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.4/100): 22.3
avg claims per patent: -50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R40404 · US Corporation #40,404 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #40,404/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Gennext
CPC-NARROW B26D · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.4/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 22.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -50% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Gennext Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Geo.’s 31.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (21%) Velocity 3.3 pts (11%) Breadth 7.9 pts (25%) Claim depth 13.4 pts (43%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
GEO M Martin · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Geo.'s Innovation Score is 31.4/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Geo.?

Each dot is one of Geo.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Geo.’s own 22.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Geo. vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Geo.'s grants concentrate

GEO. M. Martin Company is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing). By volume, Geo. sits between Gennext Technologies, Inc. and GEW (EC) Limited.

Geo.'s three-year grant acceleration

GEO. M. Martin Company shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Gennext

6
Genoimmune Therap…

6
Genticel

6
GEO Fossil Fuels

6
Geospectrum

6
Geovision

6
Gesipa Blindniett…

6
GEW (EC)

6
GEO M Martin ◀

6

What this shows GEO. holds 6 patents at rank #40,375, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near GEO

By rank, the assignees closest to #40,375 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B26D (Cutting)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in GEO's primary technology class.

Geo.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

GEO. M. Martin Company patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	16.7%
2017	1	16.7%
2018	1	16.7%
2019	1	16.7%
2021	1	16.7%
2022	1	16.7%

Which technologies does GEO. M. Martin Company patent most?

B26D - CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing 4

B65H - Handling Thin OR Filamentary Material, e.g. Sheets, Webs, Cables 3

B31B - Making Containers OF Paper, Cardboard OR Material Worked IN A Manner Analogous TO Paper 3

B65G - Transport OR Storage Devices, e.g. Conveyors FOR Loading OR Tipping, Shop Conveyor Systems OR Pneumatic Tube Conveyors 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

GEO. M. Martin Company's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

GEO. M. Martin Company's lead technology class is B26D (CUTTING; Details Common TO Machines FOR Perforating, Punching, Cutting-out, Stamping-out OR Severing), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26D
Ranked #40,404 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare GEO. M. Martin Company against Gennext Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.