Overall rank by patents
#28,814
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 16 technology areas, active 2016–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F23C (METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR COMBUSTION USING FLUID FUEL OR SOLID FUEL SUSPENDED IN ; A CARRIER GAS OR; AIR).
The verdict
GDF holds 9 US patents across 16 technology areas, rank #28,814 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
GDF SUEZ has been granted 9 US utility patents between 2016 and 2018, placing GDF SUEZ at rank #28,814 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 16 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.7 claims per patent with primary concentration in F23C (METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR COMBUSTION USING FLUID FUEL OR SOLID FUEL SUSPENDED IN ; A CARRIER GAS OR; AIR). As a Foreign Corporation, GDF SUEZ is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, GDF sits between G6 Materials Corp. (9 patents, rank #28,810) and Gentherm Automotive Systems (china) Ltd. (9 patents, rank #28,818) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 29.1/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 9 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. GDF SUEZ's 11.7 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 16 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark GDF SUEZ against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
G6 MATERIALS CORP.
9 patents
GAMECO LLC
9 patents
GAMMA PIU' S.R.L.
9 patents
GAMMATILE LLC
9 patents
GEA REFRIGERATION GERMANY GMBH
9 patents
GEBO PACKAGING SOLUTIONS FRANCE SAS
9 patents
GENESENSE TECHNOLOGY INC.
9 patents
GENTHERM AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS (CHINA) LTD.
9 patents
GDF SUEZ
9 patents
What this shows GDF holds 9 patents at rank #28,814, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,814 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in GDF's primary technology class.
GDF's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 Top 70% higher than 30% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2017 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 3 | 33.3% |
Top 15 of 16 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#28,814
Across all tracked assignees
29.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
GDF's 9 grants land it in the top 70% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.