fybr
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G08G (Traffic Control Systems).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, fybr ranks #22,621 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #22,621
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 26th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.0/100)
- 14.2
- avg claims per patent
- -29%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R22621 · US Corporation #22,621 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #22,621/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH eLstar Dynamics…
- CPC-NARROW G08G · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -29% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: eLstar Dynamics Patents B.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How fybr’s 28.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around fybr
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- fybr · this assignee 28
fybr · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows fybr's Innovation Score is 28.0/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for fybr?
Each dot is one of fybr’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). fybr’s own 14.2 claims/patent is at or below the 17.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where fybr's grants concentrate
fybr is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G08G (Traffic Control Systems). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, fybr sits between Zwift, Inc. and littleBits Electronics Inc..
Who files at fybr's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Zwift
Zwift, Inc.
12 patents
- elumigen
eLUMIGEN, LLC
12 patents
- elstar Dynamics P…
eLstar Dynamics Patents B.V.
12 patents
- freal! Foods
fReal! Foods, LLC
12 patents
- icims
iCIMS, Inc.
12 patents
- isensecloud
iSenseCloud, Inc.
12 patents
- intelligent views
intelligent views gmbh
12 patents
- littlebits
littleBits Electronics Inc.
12 patents
- fybr ◀
fybr
12 patents
What this shows fybr holds 12 patents at rank #23,723, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near fybr
By rank, the assignees closest to #23,723 in granted patent volume.
- Zwift, Inc. #23,719 · 12 patents
- eLUMIGEN, LLC #23,720 · 12 patents
- eLstar Dynamics Patents B.V. #23,721 · 12 patents
- fReal! Foods, LLC #23,722 · 12 patents
- iCIMS, Inc. #23,724 · 12 patents
- iSenseCloud, Inc. #23,725 · 12 patents
- intelligent views gmbh #23,726 · 12 patents
- littleBits Electronics Inc. #23,727 · 12 patents
Leaders in G08G (Traffic Control Systems)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in fybr's primary technology class.
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 1,228 in class
- Denso Corporation 767 in class
- Honeywell International Inc. 709 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 570 in class
- Here Global B.V. 481 in class
- The Boeing Company 464 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 447 in class
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 447 in class
fybr's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2016 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2020 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does fybr patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
fybr's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- fybr's lead technology class is G08G (Traffic Control Systems), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G08G
- Ranked #22,621 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare fybr against Zwift, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.