Overall rank by patents
#40,301
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2020–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT).
The verdict
Form holds 6 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #40,301 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Form Athletica Inc. has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2020 and 2024, placing Form Athletica Inc. at rank #40,301 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 5.5 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT). As a Foreign Corporation, Form Athletica Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Form sits between Fontaine Engineered Products, Inc. (6 patents, rank #40,297) and Foshan Aitongxiao Technology Co., Ltd (6 patents, rank #40,305) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 31.3/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2024, with 6 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Form Athletica Inc.'s 5.5 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Form Athletica Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Fontaine Engineered Products, Inc.
6 patents
Fontem Holdings 2 B.V.
6 patents
Ford Motor Company Brasil LTDA
6 patents
Forget You Not, LLC
6 patents
Forma Technologies Inc.
6 patents
Formagrid Inc
6 patents
Forte Supply LLC
6 patents
Foshan Aitongxiao Technology Co., Ltd
6 patents
Form Athletica Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Form holds 6 patents at rank #40,301, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,301 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Form's primary technology class.
Form's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 63% higher than 37% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2024 | 3 | 50.0% |
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#40,301
Across all tracked assignees
31.3 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Form's 6 grants land it in the top 63% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.