PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Flybrid Automotive Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Flybrid ranks #46,802 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 8 technology areas.

#46,802
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
28th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.6/100)
20.6
avg claims per patent
-75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R46802 · Foreign Corporation #46,802 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #46,802/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Fluid Management…
  • CPC-NARROW F16F · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 28.6/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 20.6 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -75% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Fluid Management Systems, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Flybrid’s 28.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Flybrid

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Flybrid's Innovation Score is 28.6/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Flybrid?

Each dot is one of Flybrid’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Flybrid’s own 20.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 19.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Flybrid vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 4.95.05.055.05.05.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Fluid Management Systems, Inc. - 5, 19.4Fluid Management…Fluidity Software, Inc. - 5, 25.6Fluidity SoftwareFluorchemie GmbH Frankfurt - 5, 20.2Fluorchemie Frank…Fluxus, Inc. - 5, 31.2FluxusFlying Fin Systems Pty Ltd - 5, 19.2Flying Fin System…Flypsi, Inc. - 5, 15.6FlypsiFocus Reading Technology Inc. - 5, 19.8Focus Reading Tec…Follicle, Inc. - 5, 5.4FollicleFlybrid Automotive Limited - 5, 20.6Flybrid Automotive
Flybrid vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Flybrid's grants concentrate

Flybrid Automotive Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Flybrid sits between Fluid Management Systems, Inc. and Follicle, Inc..

Who files at Flybrid's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Flybrid holds 5 patents at rank #46,890, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Flybrid

By rank, the assignees closest to #46,890 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16F (Springs)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Flybrid's primary technology class.

Flybrid's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.533.5 201620182020 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Flybrid Automotive Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 3 60.0%
2018 1 20.0%
2020 1 20.0%

Which technologies does Flybrid Automotive Limited patent most?

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Flybrid Automotive Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Flybrid Automotive Limited's lead technology class is F16F (SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; Means FOR Damping Vibration), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16F
  • Ranked #46,802 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Flybrid Automotive Limited against Fluid Management Systems, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 28.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.