PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Flow-Motion Research and Development Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Flow-motion ranks #46,787 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#46,787
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 41%
by Innovation Score (38.2/100)
19.4
avg claims per patent
+50%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R46787 · Foreign Corporation #46,787 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #46,787/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Florida Food Products
  • CPC-NARROW A63B · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 38.2/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 19.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-SURGE +50% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Florida Food Products, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Flow-motion’s 38.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Flow-motion

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Flow-motion's Innovation Score is 38.2/100 (top 41% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Flow-motion?

Each dot is one of Flow-motion’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Flow-motion’s own 19.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Flow-motion vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 4.95.05.055.05.05.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Florida Food Products, LLC - 5, 18.2Florida Food Prod…Floritec Breeding BV - 5, 1Floritec Breeding…Floshield, Inc. - 5, 15FloshieldFlow Polymers, LLC - 5, 17.8Flow PolymersFlowVIEW Tek - 5, 12Flowview TekFlowcon International ApS - 5, 16.8Flowcon Internati…Fluid Management Systems, Inc. - 5, 19.4Fluid Management…Fluidity Software, Inc. - 5, 25.6Fluidity SoftwareFlow-Motion Research and Development Ltd. - 5, 19.4Flow-motion Resea…
Flow-motion vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Flow-motion's grants concentrate

Flow-Motion Research and Development Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). By volume, Flow-motion sits between Florida Food Products, LLC and Fluidity Software, Inc..

Flow-motion's three-year grant acceleration

Flow-Motion Research and Development Ltd. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Flow-Motion's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Flow-Motion holds 5 patents at rank #46,883, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Flow-Motion

By rank, the assignees closest to #46,883 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Flow-Motion's primary technology class.

Flow-motion's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1 20152018202020232024 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Flow-Motion Research and Development Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 20.0%
2018 1 20.0%
2020 1 20.0%
2023 1 20.0%
2024 1 20.0%

Which technologies does Flow-Motion Research and Development Ltd. patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Flow-Motion Research and Development Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Flow-Motion Research and Development Ltd.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
  • Ranked #46,787 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Flow-Motion Research and Development Ltd. against Florida Food Products, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 38.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.