Where does Fiskars Garden Oy Ab rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Fiskars Garden Oy Ab ranks #14,616 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Fiskars Garden Oy Ab hold?

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab holds 20 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Fiskars Garden Oy Ab's Innovation Score?

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab has an Innovation Score of 21.1 out of 100 (8th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Fiskars Garden Oy Ab's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab's recent grant velocity is -95% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Fiskars Garden Oy Ab's patents?

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab's patents average 2.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Fiskars Garden Oy Ab patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab

Q: What technology areas does Fiskars Garden Oy Ab focus on?

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab's top technology area is B60S (Servicing, Cleaning, Repairing, Supporting, Lifting, OR Manoeuvring OF Vehicles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 2 patents, ranking #135 of 319 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 20 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60S (Servicing, Cleaning, Repairing, Supporting, Lifting, OR Manoeuvring OF Vehicles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Fiskars ranks #14,616 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 20 patents across 7 technology areas.

#14,616
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 8th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.1/100): 2.0
avg claims per patent: -95%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R14616 · Foreign Corporation #14,616 · 20 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 20 grants
MID-PACK #14,616/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Feniex Industries
CPC-NARROW B60S · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 21.1/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.0 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -95% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Feniex Industries (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Fiskars’s 21.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.5 pts (50%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 9.4 pts (45%) Claim depth 1.2 pts (6%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Fiskars Garden Oy Ab · this assignee

21
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Fiskars's Innovation Score is 21.1/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fiskars?

Each dot is one of Fiskars’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fiskars’s own 2.0 claims/patent is at or below the 17.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Fiskars vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Fiskars's grants concentrate

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 10% of grants classified under B60S (Servicing, Cleaning, Repairing, Supporting, Lifting, OR Manoeuvring OF Vehicles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Fiskars sits between FXD, LLC and Foveon, Inc..

FXD

20
Feniex Industries

20
Ferrobotics Compl…

20
Fiber Mountain

20
Flash Networks

20
Fornetix

20
Fortune Brands Wa…

20
Foveon

20
Fiskars Garden Oy… ◀

20

What this shows Fiskars holds 20 patents at rank #14,621, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Fiskars

By rank, the assignees closest to #14,621 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60S (Servicing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fiskars's primary technology class.

Fiskars's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	15.0%
2016	11	55.0%
2017	4	20.0%
2018	1	5.0%
2020	1	5.0%

Which technologies does Fiskars Garden Oy Ab patent most?

B60S - Servicing, Cleaning, Repairing, Supporting, Lifting, OR Manoeuvring OF Vehicles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

B25G - Handles FOR Hand Implements 2

A47L - Domestic Washing OR Cleaning ; Suction Cleaners IN General 1

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

B26B - Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

A46B - Brushes 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Fiskars Garden Oy Ab's lead technology class is B60S (Servicing, Cleaning, Repairing, Supporting, Lifting, OR Manoeuvring OF Vehicles, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 10% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60S
Ranked #14,616 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Fiskars Garden Oy Ab against FXD, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.