PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Field Upgrading USA, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2017–2020. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: H01M (PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
10
Total patents granted
7
CPC technology areas
14.6
Avg claims per patent
-75%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Field holds 10 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #26,285 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#26,285
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 80%
by Innovation Score (26.4/100)
14.6
avg claims per patent
-75%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Field Upgrading USA, Inc. has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2017 and 2020, placing Field Upgrading USA, Inc. at rank #26,285 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 14.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in H01M (PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY). As a US Corporation, Field Upgrading USA, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Field sits between FAST Global Solutions, Inc. (10 patents, rank #26,281) and Fishbone Packaging Inc. (10 patents, rank #26,289) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 26.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 8 in the 2015–2019 window, a -75% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Field Upgrading USA, Inc.'s 14.6 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Field Upgrading USA, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Field's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Field holds 10 patents at rank #26,285, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Field's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 Top 80% higher than 20% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). This entry sits in this band. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Above this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 2017201820192020 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Field Upgrading USA, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 1 10.0%
2018 4 40.0%
2019 3 30.0%
2020 2 20.0%

Which technologies does Field Upgrading USA, Inc. patent most?

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#26,285

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

26.4 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Field Upgrading USA, Inc. hold?
Field Upgrading USA, Inc. holds 10 US granted patents filed between 2017 and 2020, spanning 7 technology areas.
What is Field Upgrading USA, Inc.'s Innovation Score?
Field Upgrading USA, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 26.4 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Field Upgrading USA, Inc. focus on?
Field Upgrading USA, Inc.'s top technology area is H01M (PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY) with 10 patents. The company has filed patents in 7 CPC subclasses total.
Is Field Upgrading USA, Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Field Upgrading USA, Inc.'s recent filing velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for Field Upgrading USA, Inc.'s patents?
Field Upgrading USA, Inc.'s patents average 14.6 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Field Upgrading USA, Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Field's 10 grants land it in the top 80% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Field ranks #26,285 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in H01M - see who else leads that technology area. H01M leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.