Fdna, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 13 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Fdna ranks #21,123 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 13 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #21,123
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 35th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.7/100)
- 20.3
- avg claims per patent
- -82%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R21123 · Foreign Corporation #21,123 · 13 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 13 grants
- MID-PACK #21,123/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Exponential
- CPC-NARROW G06V · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -82% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Exponential Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Fdna’s 30.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Fdna
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Fdna · this assignee 31
Fdna · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Fdna's Innovation Score is 30.7/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fdna?
Each dot is one of Fdna’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fdna’s own 20.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Fdna's grants concentrate
Fdna, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2016. By volume, Fdna sits between Exponential Technologies, Inc. and Fipak Research And Development Company.
Who files at Fdna's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Exponential
Exponential Technologies, Inc.
13 patents
- Eye Drop Imaging…
Eye Drop Imaging Technology, LLC
13 patents
- FAS Medic
FAS Medic S.A.
13 patents
- FBS
FBS, Inc.
13 patents
- Ferplast S P A
Ferplast S.P.A.
13 patents
- Ficosa Adas S L U
Ficosa Adas, S.L.U.
13 patents
- Fincantieri S P A
Fincantieri S.P.A.
13 patents
- Fipak Research An…
Fipak Research And Development Company
13 patents
- Fdna ◀
Fdna, Inc.
13 patents
What this shows Fdna holds 13 patents at rank #21,119, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Fdna
By rank, the assignees closest to #21,119 in granted patent volume.
- Exponential Technologies, Inc. #21,115 · 13 patents
- Eye Drop Imaging Technology, LLC #21,116 · 13 patents
- FAS Medic S.A. #21,117 · 13 patents
- FBS, Inc. #21,118 · 13 patents
- Ferplast S.P.A. #21,120 · 13 patents
- Ficosa Adas, S.L.U. #21,121 · 13 patents
- Fincantieri S.P.A. #21,122 · 13 patents
- Fipak Research And Development Company #21,123 · 13 patents
Leaders in G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fdna's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,022 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,565 in class
- Google LLC 1,829 in class
- NEC Corporation 1,631 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 1,549 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 1,310 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,287 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,177 in class
Fdna's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2017 | 4 | 30.8% |
| 2018 | 2 | 15.4% |
| 2019 | 3 | 23.1% |
| 2020 | 2 | 15.4% |
Which technologies does Fdna, Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Fdna, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Fdna, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06V
- Ranked #21,123 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Fdna, Inc. against Exponential Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.