Fanimation, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Fanimation ranks #46,671 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #46,671
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (15.8/100)
- 5.8
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R46671 · US Corporation #46,671 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #46,671/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Factify
- CPC-NARROW F04D · 3 areas
- INNOV-LOW 15.8/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Factify (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Fanimation’s 15.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Fanimation
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Fanimation · this assignee 16
Fanimation · this assignee
16 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Fanimation's Innovation Score is 15.8/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fanimation?
Each dot is one of Fanimation’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fanimation’s own 5.8 claims/patent is at or below the 14.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Fanimation's grants concentrate
Fanimation, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Fanimation sits between Factify and Faurecia Emission Control Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Who files at Fanimation's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Factify
Factify
5 patents
- Fairness-as-a-ser…
Fairness-as-a-Service, Inc.
5 patents
- Family Hive
Family Hive LLC
5 patents
- Fanthreesixty
FanThreeSixty, LLC
5 patents
- Faserverbund Inno…
Faserverbund Innovations UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
5 patents
- Fastforward Surgi…
FastForward Surgical Inc.
5 patents
- Fatboy the Origin…
Fatboy the Original B.V.
5 patents
- Faurecia Emission…
Faurecia Emission Control Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd
5 patents
- Fanimation ◀
Fanimation, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Fanimation holds 5 patents at rank #46,822, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Fanimation
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,822 in granted patent volume.
- Factify #46,818 · 5 patents
- Fairness-as-a-Service, Inc. #46,819 · 5 patents
- Family Hive LLC #46,820 · 5 patents
- FanThreeSixty, LLC #46,821 · 5 patents
- Faserverbund Innovations UG (haftungsbeschränkt) #46,823 · 5 patents
- FastForward Surgical Inc. #46,824 · 5 patents
- Fatboy the Original B.V. #46,825 · 5 patents
- Faurecia Emission Control Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd #46,826 · 5 patents
Leaders in F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fanimation's primary technology class.
- General Electric Company 654 in class
- United Technologies Corporation 612 in class
- Raytheon Technologies Corporation 357 in class
- Safran Aircraft Engines 318 in class
- Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (HSC) 259 in class
- Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. 251 in class
- Rolls-royce plc 244 in class
- BorgWarner Inc. 188 in class
Fanimation's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
16 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Fanimation, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Fanimation, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Fanimation, Inc.'s lead technology class is F04D (Non-positive-displacement Pumps), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F04D
- Ranked #46,671 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Fanimation, Inc. against Factify, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 15.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.