Overall rank by patents
#6,238
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 54 granted patents across 20 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Expro ranks #6,238 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 54 patents across 20 technology areas.
Expro North SEA Limited has been granted 54 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Expro North SEA Limited at #6,238 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 20 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 18.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS). As a Foreign Corporation, Expro North SEA Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Expro sits between Debiotech S.a. (54 patents, rank #6,233) and Gerresheimer Regensburg Gmbh (54 patents, rank #6,241) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 52.6/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 28 grants, compared with 12 in the 2015–2019 window, a +133% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Expro North SEA Limited's 18.1 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 20 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
DEBIOTECH S.A.
54 patents
DISTECH CONTROLS INC.
54 patents
Delta Electronics (Thailand) Public Company Limited
54 patents
EASEBON SERVICES LIMITED
54 patents
Entefy Inc.
54 patents
Facense Ltd.
54 patents
Frore Systems Inc.
54 patents
Gerresheimer Regensburg GmbH
54 patents
EXPRO NORTH SEA LIMITED
54 patents
What this shows Expro holds 54 patents at rank #6,237, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #6,237 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Expro's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Expro, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (53 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (18.1 here).
Expro's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
53 Top 10% higher than 90% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 1.9% |
| 2016 | 3 | 5.6% |
| 2017 | 2 | 3.7% |
| 2018 | 3 | 5.6% |
| 2019 | 3 | 5.6% |
| 2020 | 5 | 9.3% |
| 2021 | 3 | 5.6% |
| 2022 | 5 | 9.3% |
| 2023 | 4 | 7.4% |
| 2024 | 11 | 20.4% |
| 2025partial year | 14 | 25.9% |
Top 15 of 20 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#6,238
of 50,000 tracked assignees
52.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Expro's 54 grants land it in the top 10% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.