Exar Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H03K (Pulse Technique).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Exar ranks #28,718 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #28,718
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 35th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.5/100)
- 22.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28718 · US Corporation #28,718 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #28,718/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Eulitha
- CPC-NARROW H03K · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.5/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 22.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Eulitha AG (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Exar’s 30.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Exar
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Exar · this assignee 31
Exar · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Exar's Innovation Score is 30.5/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Exar?
Each dot is one of Exar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Exar’s own 22.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Exar's grants concentrate
Exar Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under H03K (Pulse Technique). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Exar sits between Eulitha AG and Eyce, LLC.
Who files at Exar's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Eulitha
Eulitha AG
9 patents
- Everblock Systems
EverBlock Systems LLC
9 patents
- Ewig Industries M…
Ewig Industries Macao Commercial Offshore Limited
9 patents
- Exa
Exa Corporation
9 patents
- Excelitas Nobleli…
Excelitas Noblelight GmbH
9 patents
- Expanse Bioinform…
Expanse Bioinformatics
9 patents
- Extensive Energy…
Extensive Energy Technologies Partnership
9 patents
- Eyce
Eyce, LLC
9 patents
- Exar ◀
Exar Corporation
9 patents
What this shows Exar holds 9 patents at rank #28,717, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Exar
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,717 in granted patent volume.
- Eulitha AG #28,713 · 9 patents
- EverBlock Systems LLC #28,714 · 9 patents
- Ewig Industries Macao Commercial Offshore Limited #28,715 · 9 patents
- Exa Corporation #28,716 · 9 patents
- Excelitas Noblelight GmbH #28,718 · 9 patents
- Expanse Bioinformatics #28,719 · 9 patents
- Extensive Energy Technologies Partnership #28,720 · 9 patents
- Eyce, LLC #28,721 · 9 patents
Leaders in H03K (Pulse Technique)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Exar's primary technology class.
- Texas Instruments Incorporated 1,140 in class
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. 762 in class
- SK hynix Inc. 699 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 614 in class
- Intel Corporation 607 in class
- Micron Technology, Inc. 537 in class
- Infineon Technologies AG 419 in class
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. 389 in class
Exar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2017 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2018 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 4 | 44.4% |
Which technologies does Exar Corporation patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Exar Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Exar Corporation's lead technology class is H03K (Pulse Technique), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H03K
- Ranked #28,718 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Exar Corporation against Eulitha AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.