Exacta Systems, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Exacta ranks #26,267 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #26,267
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 42nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.7/100)
- 35.2
- avg claims per patent
- +700%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R26267 · US Corporation #26,267 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #26,267/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Etherdyne
- CPC-NARROW G07F · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 35.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +700% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Etherdyne Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Exacta’s 32.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Exacta
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Exacta Systems · this assignee 33
Exacta Systems · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Exacta's Innovation Score is 32.7/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Exacta?
Each dot is one of Exacta’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Exacta’s own 35.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Exacta's grants concentrate
Exacta Systems, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 90% of grants classified under G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Exacta sits between EtherFAX, LLC and Expedite International.
Exacta's three-year grant acceleration
Exacta Systems, LLC shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Exacta's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Etherfax
EtherFAX, LLC
10 patents
- Etherdyne
Etherdyne Technologies, Inc.
10 patents
- Evolution Lighting
Evolution Lighting, LLC
10 patents
- Evolve
Evolve Technologies, LLC
10 patents
- Excalibur Pharmac…
Excalibur Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
10 patents
- Excelfore
Excelfore Corporation
10 patents
- Exnodes
Exnodes Inc.
10 patents
- Expedite Internat…
Expedite International
10 patents
- Exacta Systems ◀
Exacta Systems, LLC
10 patents
What this shows Exacta holds 10 patents at rank #26,272, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Exacta
By rank, the assignees closest to #26,272 in granted patent volume.
- EtherFAX, LLC #26,268 · 10 patents
- Etherdyne Technologies, Inc. #26,269 · 10 patents
- Evolution Lighting, LLC #26,270 · 10 patents
- Evolve Technologies, LLC #26,271 · 10 patents
- Excalibur Pharmaceuticals, Inc. #26,273 · 10 patents
- Excelfore Corporation #26,274 · 10 patents
- Exnodes Inc. #26,275 · 10 patents
- Expedite International #26,276 · 10 patents
Leaders in G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Exacta's primary technology class.
Exacta's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2021 | 5 | 50.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does Exacta Systems, LLC patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Exacta Systems, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Exacta Systems, LLC's lead technology class is G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus), 90% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07F
- Ranked #26,267 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Exacta Systems, LLC against EtherFAX, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.