PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Eocycle Technologies Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Eocycle ranks #28,691 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 2 technology areas.

#28,691
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
13th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.0/100)
18.4
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28691 · Foreign Corporation #28,691 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #28,691/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ensitech IP Pty
  • CPC-NARROW H02K · 2 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.0/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ensitech IP Pty. Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Eocycle’s 24.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Eocycle

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Eocycle's Innovation Score is 24.0/100 (13th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Eocycle?

Each dot is one of Eocycle’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Eocycle’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Eocycle vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Ensitech IP Pty. Limited - 9, 8.11Ensitech IP PtyEntegrion, Inc. - 9, 15EntegrionEnviromix, Inc. - 9, 13EnviromixEoCell Limited - 9, 15.33EocellEpiroc Drilling Solutions, LLC - 9, 18Epiroc Drilling S…Epona LLC - 9, 21.22EponaEstis Compression, LLC - 9, 14.67Estis CompressionEstwing Manufacturing Company, Inc. - 9, 7.33Estwing Manufactu…Eocycle Technologies Inc. - 9, 18.44Eocycle
Eocycle vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Eocycle's grants concentrate

Eocycle Technologies Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Eocycle sits between Ensitech IP Pty. Limited and Estwing Manufacturing Company, Inc..

Who files at Eocycle's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Eocycle holds 9 patents at rank #28,705, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Eocycle

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,705 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Eocycle's primary technology class.

Eocycle's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 13th percentile higher than 13% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 2016201720182019 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Eocycle Technologies Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 2 22.2%
2017 5 55.6%
2018 1 11.1%
2019 1 11.1%

Which technologies does Eocycle Technologies Inc. patent most?

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Eocycle Technologies Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Eocycle Technologies Inc.'s lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
  • Ranked #28,691 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Eocycle Technologies Inc. against Ensitech IP Pty. Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.