Overall rank by patents
#28,690
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Eocell ranks #28,690 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 11 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28690 · Foreign Corporation #28,690 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Enevo Oy (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
4DS Memory · near
30 score
Des-Case · near
30 score
E2V (UK) · near
30 score
EoCell · this assignee
30 score
Gemalto M2M · near
30 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Eocell's Innovation Score is 30.0/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
EoCell Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, Eocell sits between Enevo Oy and Estis Compression, LLC.
EoCell Limited shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Enevo Oy
9 patents
Ensitech IP Pty. Limited
9 patents
Entegrion, Inc.
9 patents
Enviromix, Inc.
9 patents
Eocycle Technologies Inc.
9 patents
Epiroc Drilling Solutions, LLC
9 patents
Epona LLC
9 patents
Estis Compression, LLC
9 patents
EoCell Limited
9 patents
What this shows EoCell holds 9 patents at rank #28,704, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,704 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in EoCell's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for EoCell, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (30 here).
Eocell's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2019 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 11.1% |
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#28,690
of 49,997 tracked assignees
30.0 out of 100
What to do with this data
EoCell Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.