Where does Entotem Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Entotem Limited ranks #46,523 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Entotem Limited hold?

Entotem Limited holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2023, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Entotem Limited's Innovation Score?

Entotem Limited has an Innovation Score of 30.2 out of 100 (33rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Entotem Limited focus on?

Entotem Limited's top technology area is G11B (Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Record Carrier AND Transducer) with 2 patents, ranking #474 of 933 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Entotem Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Entotem Limited's recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Entotem Limited's patents?

Entotem Limited's patents average 18.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Entotem Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Entotem Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G11B (Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Record Carrier AND Transducer).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Entotem ranks #46,523 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 7 technology areas.

#46,523
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (30.2/100): 18.8
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R46523 · Foreign Corporation #46,523 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #46,523/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Enno
CPC-NARROW G11B · 7 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Enno Electronics Co., Ltd (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Entotem’s 30.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (21%) Velocity 3.3 pts (11%) Breadth 9.4 pts (31%) Claim depth 11.3 pts (37%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Entotem · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Entotem's Innovation Score is 30.2/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Entotem?

Each dot is one of Entotem’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Entotem’s own 18.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Entotem vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Entotem's grants concentrate

Entotem Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under G11B (Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Record Carrier AND Transducer). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Entotem sits between Enno Electronics Co., Ltd and Eonite Perception Inc..

Entotem's three-year grant acceleration

Entotem Limited shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Enno

5
Ensurge Micropowe…

5
Enterprises of CC

5
Entia

5
Entry Point

5
Enviro-tex Produc…

5
Envision Energy

5
Eonite Perception

5
Entotem ◀

5

What this shows Entotem holds 5 patents at rank #46,599, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Entotem

By rank, the assignees closest to #46,599 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G11B (Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Re…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Entotem's primary technology class.

Entotem's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Entotem Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2019	2	40.0%
2023	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Entotem Limited patent most?

G11B - Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Record Carrier AND Transducer 2

H03F - Amplifiers 2

H03G - Control OF Amplification 2

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 1

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 1

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 1

H04B - Transmission 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Entotem Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Entotem Limited's lead technology class is G11B (Information Storage Based ON Relative Movement Between Record Carrier AND Transducer), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G11B
Ranked #46,523 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Entotem Limited against Enno Electronics Co., Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.