Overall rank by patents
#35,123
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 2 technology areas, active 2021–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT).
The verdict
Eleiko holds 7 US patents across 2 technology areas, rank #35,123 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Eleiko Group AB has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2021 and 2025, placing Eleiko Group AB at rank #35,123 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 2 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in A63B (APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT). As a Foreign Corporation, Eleiko Group AB is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Eleiko sits between Electric Hydrogen Co. (7 patents, rank #35,119) and ELEY Corporation (7 patents, rank #35,127) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 26.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2021 through 2025, with 7 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Eleiko Group AB's 11.9 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 2 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Eleiko Group AB against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
ELECTRIC HYDROGEN CO.
7 patents
ELECTRIC MOTION COMPANY, INC.
7 patents
ELECTRICAL GRID MONITORING LTD.
7 patents
ELECTRICITY NORTH WEST PROPERTY LIMITED
7 patents
ELEMENTAL ENGINEERING AG
7 patents
ELEMICA, INC.
7 patents
ELEVATOR SAFETY COMPANY
7 patents
ELEY CORPORATION
7 patents
ELEIKO GROUP AB
7 patents
What this shows Eleiko holds 7 patents at rank #35,123, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,123 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Eleiko's primary technology class.
Eleiko's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 Top 81% higher than 19% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2022 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#35,123
Across all tracked assignees
26.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Eleiko's 7 grants land it in the top 81% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.