PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

EKO Development Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 67 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, EKO ranks #5,151 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 67 patents across 0 technology areas.

#5,151
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
6th percentile
by Innovation Score (20.0/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent
+42%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5151 · Foreign Corporation #5,151 · 67 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 67 grants
  • UPPER-Q #5,151/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Cellix Bio Private
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-LOW 20.0/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-UP +42% vel
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Cellix Bio Private Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around EKO

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows EKO's Innovation Score is 20.0/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Where EKO's grants concentrate

EKO Development Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2019 (9 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2018. By volume, EKO sits between Cellix Bio Private Limited and Fujitsu Client Computing Limited.

EKO's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, EKO Development Ltd. moved from 25 to 18 grants (0.72x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Who files at EKO's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows EKO holds 67 patents at rank #5,151, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near EKO

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,151 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for EKO, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (20 here).

Cell Impact AB 20 Graff Breeding A/S 20 LXL Group Inc. 20 Vionic Group LLC 20

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.0 here).

Amini Innovation Corporation 1.0 avg Shenzhen Tize Technology Co., Ltd. 1.0 avg Omega Ltd. 1.0 avg Turn 5, Inc. 1.0 avg

EKO's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

20 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

246810 2016201720182019202020212022202320242025 9
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
EKO Development Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 8 11.9%
2017 4 6.0%
2018 3 4.5%
2019 9 13.4%
2020 7 10.4%
2021 9 13.4%
2022 7 10.4%
2023 6 9.0%
2024 5 7.5%
2025partial year 9 13.4%

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#5,151

of 49,997 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

20.0 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

EKO Development Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #5,151 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare EKO Development Ltd. against Cellix Bio Private Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 20.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.