efabless corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, efabless ranks #31,501 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #31,501
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 41st percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.3/100)
- 21.8
- avg claims per patent
- +67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31501 · US Corporation #31,501 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,501/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH b-ONE Ortho
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 21.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: b-ONE Ortho, Corp (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How efabless’s 32.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around efabless
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- efabless · this assignee 32
efabless · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows efabless's Innovation Score is 32.3/100 (41st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for efabless?
Each dot is one of efabless’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). efabless’s own 21.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where efabless's grants concentrate
efabless corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, efabless sits between b-ONE Ortho, Corp and i-calQ, LLC.
efabless's three-year grant acceleration
efabless corporation shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at efabless's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- b-one Ortho
b-ONE Ortho, Corp
8 patents
- eaffirm
eAffirm LLC
8 patents
- econnect
eConnect, Inc.
8 patents
- eero
eero Inc.
8 patents
- envveno Medical
enVVeno Medical Corporation
8 patents
- i Proov
i Proov Limited
8 patents
- i-blason
i-Blason LLC
8 patents
- i-calq
i-calQ, LLC
8 patents
- efabless ◀
efabless corporation
8 patents
What this shows efabless holds 8 patents at rank #34,004, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near efabless
By rank, the assignees closest to #34,004 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in efabless's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
efabless's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 41st percentile higher than 41% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 2021 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 25.0% |
Which technologies does efabless corporation patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
efabless corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- efabless corporation's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #31,501 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare efabless corporation against b-ONE Ortho, Corp, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.