Edward D. Ioli Trust
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G08G (Traffic Control Systems).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Edward ranks #39,967 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #39,967
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 20th percentile
- by Innovation Score (26.2/100)
- 19.3
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R39967 · US Corporation #39,967 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #39,967/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Edan Diagnostics
- CPC-NARROW G08G · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 26.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Edan Diagnostics (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Edward’s 26.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Edward
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Edward D Ioli Trust · this assignee 26
Edward D Ioli Trust · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Edward's Innovation Score is 26.2/100 (20th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Edward?
Each dot is one of Edward’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Edward’s own 19.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Edward's grants concentrate
Edward D. Ioli Trust is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G08G (Traffic Control Systems). By volume, Edward sits between Edan Diagnostics and Eggplant Limited.
Who files at Edward's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Edan Diagnostics
Edan Diagnostics
6 patents
- Edgeverve Systems
Edgeverve Systems Limited
6 patents
- Education4sight
Education4sight GmbH
6 patents
- Educational Found…
Educational Foundation Jichi Medical University
6 patents
- Eenotech
Eenotech, Inc.
6 patents
- Effegi Brevetti S…
Effegi Brevetti S.R.L.
6 patents
- Efunds
EFunds Corporation
6 patents
- Eggplant
Eggplant Limited
6 patents
- Edward D Ioli Tru… ◀
Edward D. Ioli Trust
6 patents
What this shows Edward holds 6 patents at rank #39,948, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Edward
By rank, the assignees closest to #39,948 in granted patent volume.
- Edan Diagnostics #39,944 · 6 patents
- Edgeverve Systems Limited #39,945 · 6 patents
- Education4sight GmbH #39,946 · 6 patents
- Educational Foundation Jichi Medical University #39,947 · 6 patents
- Eenotech, Inc. #39,949 · 6 patents
- Effegi Brevetti S.R.L. #39,950 · 6 patents
- EFunds Corporation #39,951 · 6 patents
- Eggplant Limited #39,952 · 6 patents
Leaders in G08G (Traffic Control Systems)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Edward's primary technology class.
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 1,228 in class
- Denso Corporation 767 in class
- Honeywell International Inc. 709 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 570 in class
- Here Global B.V. 481 in class
- The Boeing Company 464 in class
- Hyundai Motor Company 447 in class
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 447 in class
Edward's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 20th percentile higher than 20% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Edward D. Ioli Trust patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Edward D. Ioli Trust's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Edward D. Ioli Trust's lead technology class is G08G (Traffic Control Systems), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G08G
- Ranked #39,967 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Edward D. Ioli Trust against Edan Diagnostics, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 26.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.