Where does EdiZONE, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), EdiZONE, LLC ranks #39,962 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does EdiZONE, LLC hold?

EdiZONE, LLC holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2017, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is EdiZONE, LLC's Innovation Score?

EdiZONE, LLC has an Innovation Score of 31.6 out of 100 (38th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does EdiZONE, LLC focus on?

EdiZONE, LLC's top technology area is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification) with 3 patents, ranking #3,595 of 9,657 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is EdiZONE, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

EdiZONE, LLC's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for EdiZONE, LLC's patents?

EdiZONE, LLC's patents average 23.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the EdiZONE, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

EdiZONE, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Edizone ranks #39,962 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 9 technology areas.

#39,962
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 38th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.6/100): 23.8
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R39962 · US Corporation #39,962 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #39,962/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Ed Wusthof Dreizackw…
CPC-NARROW Y10T · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 31.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 23.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ed. Wusthof Dreizackwerk KG (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Edizone’s 31.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (21%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 10.6 pts (34%) Claim depth 14.3 pts (45%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
EdiZONE · this assignee

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Edizone's Innovation Score is 31.6/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Edizone?

Each dot is one of Edizone’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Edizone’s own 23.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Edizone vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Edizone's grants concentrate

EdiZONE, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification). By volume, Edizone sits between Ed. Wusthof Dreizackwerk KG and Efficient Drivetrains, Inc..

Ed Wusthof Dreiza…

6
Eden Innovations

6
Edgecast

6
Edgio

6
Educationdynamics

6
Edwards Vacuum En…

6
Effectivetalent O…

6
Efficient Drivetr…

6
Edizone ◀

6

What this shows EdiZONE holds 6 patents at rank #40,042, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near EdiZONE

By rank, the assignees closest to #40,042 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in EdiZONE's primary technology class.

Edizone's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

EdiZONE, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	33.3%
2016	2	33.3%
2017	2	33.3%

Which technologies does EdiZONE, LLC patent most?

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 3

A47C - CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds 3

B29L - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass B29c, Relating TO Particular Articles 2

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 2

B68G - Methods, Equipment, OR Machines FOR USE IN UPHOLSTERING; Upholstery NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 2

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 2

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 1

C08L - Compositions OF Macromolecular Compounds 1

D06N - Wall, Floor, OR Like Covering Materials, e.g. Linoleum, Oilcloth, Artificial Leather, Roofing Felt, Consisting OF A Fibrous WEB Coated With A Layer OF Macromolecular MATERIAL; Flexible Sheet Material NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

EdiZONE, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

EdiZONE, LLC's lead technology class is Y10T (Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore Y10T
Ranked #39,962 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare EdiZONE, LLC against Ed. Wusthof Dreizackwerk KG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 31.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.