Overall rank by patents
#31,485
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 7 technology areas, active 2017–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY).
The verdict
EDAP holds 8 US patents across 7 technology areas, rank #31,485 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
EDAP TMS France has been granted 8 US utility patents between 2017 and 2024, placing EDAP TMS France at rank #31,485 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 7 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.0 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY). As a Foreign Corporation, EDAP TMS France is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, EDAP sits between Ecential Robotics (8 patents, rank #31,481) and Efemoral Medical, Inc. (8 patents, rank #31,489) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 34.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +0% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. EDAP TMS France's 13.0 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 7 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark EDAP TMS France against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
ECENTIAL ROBOTICS
8 patents
ECHOSTREAMS INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS, LLC
8 patents
ECOKAP TECHNOLOGIES LLC
8 patents
ECOLE NATIONALE SUPERIEURE DE TECHNIQUES AVANCEES
8 patents
EDERA L3C
8 patents
EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS, LLC
8 patents
EFC SYSTEMS, INC.
8 patents
EFEMORAL MEDICAL, INC.
8 patents
EDAP TMS FRANCE
8 patents
What this shows EDAP holds 8 patents at rank #31,485, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,485 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in EDAP's primary technology class.
EDAP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 Top 51% higher than 49% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#31,485
Across all tracked assignees
34.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
EDAP's 8 grants land it in the top 51% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.