Overall rank by patents
#35,101
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 11 technology areas, active 2016–2024. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C21D (MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING).
The verdict
ECM holds 7 US patents across 11 technology areas, rank #35,101 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
ECM Technologies, Llc has been granted 7 US utility patents between 2016 and 2024, placing ECM Technologies, Llc at rank #35,101 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 11 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 9.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in C21D (MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING). As a US Corporation, ECM Technologies, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, ECM sits between ECE (7 patents, rank #35,097) and Ecospray Technologies S.r.l. (7 patents, rank #35,105) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 38.2/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 5 in the 2015–2019 window, a -60% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. ECM Technologies, Llc's 9.9 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while concentration in 11 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark ECM Technologies, Llc against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
ECE
7 patents
ECHOSTAR BROADCASTING CORPORATION
7 patents
ECKERLE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
7 patents
ECM Industries, LLC
7 patents
ECNA, LLC
7 patents
ECOLE SUPERIEURE DE CHIMIE PHYSIQUE ELECTRONIQUE DE LYON
7 patents
ECOROLL AG WERKZEUGTECHNIK
7 patents
ECOSPRAY TECHNOLOGIES S.R.L.
7 patents
ECM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
7 patents
What this shows ECM holds 7 patents at rank #35,101, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,101 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in ECM's primary technology class.
ECM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 41% higher than 59% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#35,101
Across all tracked assignees
38.2 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
ECM's 7 grants land it in the top 41% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.